From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758365AbZFVUCb (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:02:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758279AbZFVUCV (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:02:21 -0400 Received: from [87.239.71.157] ([87.239.71.157]:56994 "EHLO mail.mendo.dk" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758259AbZFVUCT (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:02:19 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 401 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:02:19 EDT Message-ID: <4A3FE1BA.10908@mendo.dk> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:55:38 +0200 From: Thomas Petersen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090604 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.29+ NFS-Server Problem "reconnect_path: npd != pd" References: <20090521142026.GA5566@geggus.net> <1242924599.6687.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090521165751.GA4428@geggus.net> <1242927133.6687.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sven Geggus wrote: > Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> So what is the underlying filesystem that you are exporting, and what >> does your /etc/exports file look like? > > The underlying filesystem is xfs and /etc/exports (unchanged) is here: > > --cut-- > /home/sven 192.168.3.2(rw,no_root_squash,async,subtree_check) 192.168.3.6(rw,no_root_squash,async,subtree_check) 192.168.3.8(rw,no_root_squash,async,subtree_check) I switched to 2.6.29 on my server yesterday. It seemed to work fine but a few hours ago I began to get the same errors (reconnect_path: npd != pd). I have a diskless client which received stale nfs handles and stopped working properly. I have a laptop also which is still working ok but that client doesn't utilize the nfs filesystems that much. I'm using gentoo on all computers. Both clients are using 2.6.28. Server switched from 2.6.27 to 2.6.29. I am using XFS on the server ! There is a special thing about the server though and until I saw this discussion I thought that was the problem: I updated the kernel because I also replaced the hardware (except the harddrives). I switched from an old AMD Athlon (32 bit) to an AMD Phenom II (64 bit, 4 cores). The new kernel is compiled in 64 bit but all userland is still the old 32 bit compiled on the old Athlon. Everything runs through IA32 emulation. Both clients are 32 bit machines. In a few days I'll start to update to 64 bit userland on the server and see if that has an effect on the problem. Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAko/4boACgkQOaC6N60T7rze2gCfVRHI6H5hzyC4eX80H2hywJ81 3/QAnA17/9MEO3Zm8eosOtfzU+q3sYi6 =fgT+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----