public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	jens.axboe@oracle.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
	paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
	fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
	m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, jbaron@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com,
	snitzer@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io-controller: Preempt a non-rt queue if a rt ioq is present in ancestor or sibling groups
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:44:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4079B8.4020402@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090622172123.GE15600@redhat.com>

Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 03:44:08PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
>> Preempt the ongoing non-rt ioq if there are rt ioqs waiting for dispatching
>> in ancestor or sibling groups. It will give other group's rt ioq an chance 
>> to dispatch ASAP.
>>
> 
> Hi Gui,
> 
> Will new preempton logic of traversing up the hiearchy so that both new
> queue and old queue are at same level to take a preemption decision not
> take care of above scenario?

Hi Vivek,

Would you explain a bit what do you mean about "both new queue and old queue 
are at same level to take a preemption decision". I don't understand it well.

> 
> Please have a look at bfq_find_matching_entity().
> 
> At the same time we probably don't want to preempt the non-rt queue
> with an RT queue in sibling group until and unless sibling group is an
> RT group.
> 
> 		root
> 		/  \
> 	   BEgrpA  BEgrpB
> 	      |     |	
> 	  BEioq1   RTioq2
> 
> Above we got two BE group A and B and assume ioq in group A is being
> served and then an RT request in group B comes. Because group B is an
> BE class group, we should not preempt the queue in group A.

  Yes, i also have this concern. So, it does not allow non-rt group preempts
  another group. I'll check whether there is a way to address this issue.

> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  block/elevator-fq.c |   44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  block/elevator-fq.h |    1 +
>>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c
>> index 2ad40eb..80526fd 100644
>> --- a/block/elevator-fq.c
>> +++ b/block/elevator-fq.c
>> @@ -3245,8 +3245,16 @@ void elv_add_ioq_busy(struct elv_fq_data *efqd, struct io_queue *ioq)
>>  	elv_mark_ioq_busy(ioq);
>>  	efqd->busy_queues++;
>>  	if (elv_ioq_class_rt(ioq)) {
>> +		struct io_entity *entity;
>>  		struct io_group *iog = ioq_to_io_group(ioq);
>> +
>>  		iog->busy_rt_queues++;
>> +		entity = iog->entity.parent;
>> +
>> +		for_each_entity(entity) {
>> +			iog = io_entity_to_iog(entity);
>> +			iog->sub_busy_rt_queues++;
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_GROUP_IOSCHED
>> @@ -3290,9 +3298,18 @@ void elv_del_ioq_busy(struct elevator_queue *e, struct io_queue *ioq,
>>  	elv_clear_ioq_busy(ioq);
>>  	BUG_ON(efqd->busy_queues == 0);
>>  	efqd->busy_queues--;
>> +
>>  	if (elv_ioq_class_rt(ioq)) {
>> +		struct io_entity *entity;
>>  		struct io_group *iog = ioq_to_io_group(ioq);
>> +
>>  		iog->busy_rt_queues--;
>> +		entity = iog->entity.parent;
>> +
>> +		for_each_entity(entity) {
>> +			iog = io_entity_to_iog(entity);
>> +			iog->sub_busy_rt_queues--;
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	elv_deactivate_ioq(efqd, ioq, requeue);
>> @@ -3735,12 +3752,32 @@ int elv_iosched_expire_ioq(struct request_queue *q, int slice_expired,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int check_rt_queue(struct io_queue *ioq)
>> +{
>> +	struct io_group *iog;
>> +	struct io_entity *entity;
>> +
>> +	iog = ioq_to_io_group(ioq);
>> +
>> +	if (iog->busy_rt_queues)
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>> +	entity = iog->entity.parent;
>> +
>> +	for_each_entity(entity) {
>> +		iog = io_entity_to_iog(entity);
>> +		if (iog->sub_busy_rt_queues)
>> +			return 1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /* Common layer function to select the next queue to dispatch from */
>>  void *elv_fq_select_ioq(struct request_queue *q, int force)
>>  {
>>  	struct elv_fq_data *efqd = &q->elevator->efqd;
>>  	struct io_queue *new_ioq = NULL, *ioq = elv_active_ioq(q->elevator);
>> -	struct io_group *iog;
>>  	int slice_expired = 1;
>>  
>>  	if (!elv_nr_busy_ioq(q->elevator))
>> @@ -3811,12 +3848,9 @@ void *elv_fq_select_ioq(struct request_queue *q, int force)
>>  	/*
>>  	 * If we have a RT cfqq waiting, then we pre-empt the current non-rt
>>  	 * cfqq.
>> -	 *
>> -	 * TODO: This does not seem right across the io groups. Fix it.
>>  	 */
>> -	iog = ioq_to_io_group(ioq);
>>  
>> -	if (!elv_ioq_class_rt(ioq) && iog->busy_rt_queues) {
>> +	if (!elv_ioq_class_rt(ioq) && check_rt_queue(ioq)) {
>>  		/*
>>  		 * We simulate this as cfqq timed out so that it gets to bank
>>  		 * the remaining of its time slice.
>> diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.h b/block/elevator-fq.h
>> index b3193f8..be6c1af 100644
>> --- a/block/elevator-fq.h
>> +++ b/block/elevator-fq.h
>> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ struct io_group {
>>  	 * non-RT cfqq in service when this value is non-zero.
>>  	 */
>>  	unsigned int busy_rt_queues;
>> +	unsigned int sub_busy_rt_queues;
>>  
>>  	int deleting;
>>  	unsigned short iocg_id;
>> -- 
>> 1.5.4.rc3
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Regards
Gui Jianfeng


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-23  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-19 20:37 [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5) Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 01/20] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 02/20] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22  8:46   ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-22 12:43     ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23  2:43       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23  4:10         ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23  7:32           ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-23 13:42             ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23  2:05     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23  2:20       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-30  6:40   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-01  1:28     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-01  9:24   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 03/20] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 04/20] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 05/20] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-29  5:27   ` [PATCH] io-controller: optimization for iog deletion when elevator exiting Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-29 14:06     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-30 17:14       ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-01  1:34         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 06/20] io-controller: cfq changes to use hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 07/20] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 12:10   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-23 14:38     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 08/20] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-06-30  7:49   ` [PATCH] io-controller: Don't expire an idle ioq if it's the only ioq in hierarchy Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-01  1:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-01  1:40       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 09/20] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 10/20] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 11/20] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 12/20] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 13/20] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 14/20] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 15/20] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22  1:45   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-22 15:39     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 16/20] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 17/20] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 18/20] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-06-24 21:52   ` Paul Menage
2009-06-25 10:23     ` [PATCH] io-controller: do some changes of io.policy interface Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-25 12:55       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-26  0:27         ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26  0:59         ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 19/20] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 20/20] io-controller: experimental debug patch for async queue wait before expiry Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22  7:44   ` [PATCH] io-controller: Preempt a non-rt queue if a rt ioq is present in ancestor or sibling groups Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-22 17:21     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23  6:44       ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2009-06-23 14:02         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-24  9:20           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26  8:13             ` [PATCH 1/2] io-controller: Prepare a rt ioq list in efqd to keep track of busy rt ioqs Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26  8:13             ` [PATCH 2/2] io-controller: make rt preemption happen in the whole hierarchy Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 12:39               ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-21 15:21 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5) Balbir Singh
2009-06-22 15:30   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 15:40     ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-22 16:02       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 16:06         ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-22 17:08           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23  6:52             ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-29 16:04 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-06-29 17:23   ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A4079B8.4020402@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpshah@google.com \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox