From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@uclinux.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] [PATCH] m68k: restore lost coldfire CLOCK_TICK_RATE
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:33:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A42C5DC.1040103@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090624211144.GA13167@frolo.macqel>
Hi Philippe,
Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:18:55PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> HI Philippe,
>>
>> Philippe De Muyter wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>> The good definition of CLOCK_TICK_RATE for coldfires has been lost in the
>>> merge of m68k and m68knommu include files. Restore it. Culprit :
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ebafc17468d58bd903c886175ca84a4edc69ae1d;hp=34055b806a6334624e7e8af6eefc3aee42372a85
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>
>> Is it needed?
>> What is broken with the existing value?
>
> I am no ntp expert, but IIRC kernel/time/ntp.c needs to know the remainder
> of CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ to obtain a good stability of the time. That's
> probably only needed when you have ntpd running.
I thought it did that based on gettimeofday()? And that ends up
going through the underlying timer code, which for both of
the ColdFire timer types doesn't use CLOCK_TICK_RATE. They directly
use the MCF_CLK definition.
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-20 20:11 [PATCH] m68k: restore lost coldfire CLOCK_TICK_RATE Philippe De Muyter
2009-06-22 3:18 ` [uClinux-dev] " Greg Ungerer
2009-06-24 21:11 ` Philippe De Muyter
2009-06-25 0:33 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2009-06-25 11:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-08-12 6:42 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-08-13 2:25 ` Philippe De Muyter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A42C5DC.1040103@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=uclinux-dev@uclinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox