From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
taka@valinux.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, jbaron@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com,
snitzer@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] io-controller: do some changes of io.policy interface
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:23:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A435038.60406@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830906241452t76e64815s7d68a22a6e746a59@mail.gmail.com>
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Vivek Goyal<vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
>> You can use the following format to play with the new interface.
>> #echo DEV:weight:ioprio_class > /patch/to/cgroup/policy
>> weight=0 means removing the policy for DEV.
>>
>> Examples:
>> Configure weight=300 ioprio_class=2 on /dev/hdb in this cgroup
>> # echo /dev/hdb:300:2 > io.policy
>> # cat io.policy
>> dev weight class
>> /dev/hdb 300 2
>
> I think that the read and write should be consistent. Can you just use
> white-space separation for both, rather than colon-separation for
> writes and white-space separation for reads?
>
> Also, storing device inode paths statically as strings into the
> io_policy structure seems wrong, since it's quite possible for the
> device node that was used originally to be gone by the time that
> someone reads the io.policy file, or renamed, or even replaced with an
> inode that refers to to a different block device
>
> My preferred alternatives would be:
>
> - read/write the value as a device number rather than a name
> - read/write the block device's actual name (e.g. hda or sda) rather
> than a path to the inode
>
Hi Paul, Vivek
Here is a patch to fix the issue Paul raised.
This patch achives the following goals
1 According to Paul's comment, Modifing io.policy interface to
use device number for read/write directly.
2 Just use white-space separation for both, rather than colon-
separation for writes and white-space separation for reads.
3 Do more strict checking for inputting.
old interface:
Configure weight=300 ioprio_class=2 on /dev/hdb in this cgroup
# echo "/dev/hdb:300:2" > io.policy
# cat io.policy
dev weight class
/dev/hdb 300 2
new interface:
Configure weight=300 ioprio_class=2 on /dev/hdb in this cgroup
# echo "3:64 300 2" > io.policy
# cat io.policy
dev weight class
3:64 300 2
Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
block/elevator-fq.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
block/elevator-fq.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c
index d779282..83c831b 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.c
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.c
@@ -1895,12 +1895,12 @@ static int io_cgroup_policy_read(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
if (list_empty(&iocg->policy_list))
goto out;
- seq_printf(m, "dev weight class\n");
+ seq_printf(m, "dev\tweight\tclass\n");
spin_lock_irq(&iocg->lock);
list_for_each_entry(pn, &iocg->policy_list, node) {
- seq_printf(m, "%s %lu %lu\n", pn->dev_name,
- pn->weight, pn->ioprio_class);
+ seq_printf(m, "%u:%u\t%lu\t%lu\n", MAJOR(pn->dev),
+ MINOR(pn->dev), pn->weight, pn->ioprio_class);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&iocg->lock);
out:
@@ -1936,44 +1936,65 @@ static struct io_policy_node *policy_search_node(const struct io_cgroup *iocg,
return NULL;
}
-static int devname_to_devnum(const char *buf, dev_t *dev)
+static int check_dev_num(dev_t dev)
{
- struct block_device *bdev;
+ int part = 0;
struct gendisk *disk;
- int part;
- bdev = lookup_bdev(buf);
- if (IS_ERR(bdev))
+ disk = get_gendisk(dev, &part);
+ if (!disk || part)
return -ENODEV;
- disk = get_gendisk(bdev->bd_dev, &part);
- if (part)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- *dev = MKDEV(disk->major, disk->first_minor);
- bdput(bdev);
-
return 0;
}
static int policy_parse_and_set(char *buf, struct io_policy_node *newpn)
{
- char *s[3], *p;
+ char *s[4], *p, *major_s = NULL, *minor_s = NULL;
int ret;
+ unsigned long major, minor;
int i = 0;
+ dev_t dev;
memset(s, 0, sizeof(s));
- while ((p = strsep(&buf, ":")) != NULL) {
+ while ((p = strsep(&buf, " ")) != NULL) {
if (!*p)
continue;
s[i++] = p;
+
+ /* Prevent from inputing too many things */
+ if (i == 4)
+ break;
}
- ret = devname_to_devnum(s[0], &newpn->dev);
+ if (i != 3)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ p = strsep(&s[0], ":");
+ if (p != NULL)
+ major_s = p;
+ else
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ minor_s = s[0];
+ if (!minor_s)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = strict_strtoul(major_s, 10, &major);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = strict_strtoul(minor_s, 10, &minor);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ dev = MKDEV(major, minor);
+
+ ret = check_dev_num(dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
- strcpy(newpn->dev_name, s[0]);
+ newpn->dev = dev;
if (s[1] == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.h b/block/elevator-fq.h
index b3193f8..7722ebe 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.h
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.h
@@ -286,7 +286,6 @@ struct io_group {
struct io_policy_node {
struct list_head node;
- char dev_name[32];
dev_t dev;
unsigned long weight;
unsigned long ioprio_class;
--
1.5.4.rc3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 20:37 [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5) Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 01/20] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 02/20] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 8:46 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-22 12:43 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23 2:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 4:10 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23 7:32 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-23 13:42 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-06-23 2:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 2:20 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-30 6:40 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-01 1:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-01 9:24 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 03/20] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 04/20] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 05/20] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-29 5:27 ` [PATCH] io-controller: optimization for iog deletion when elevator exiting Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-29 14:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-30 17:14 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-01 1:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 06/20] io-controller: cfq changes to use hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 07/20] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 12:10 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-23 14:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 08/20] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-06-30 7:49 ` [PATCH] io-controller: Don't expire an idle ioq if it's the only ioq in hierarchy Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-01 1:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-01 1:40 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 09/20] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 10/20] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 11/20] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 12/20] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 13/20] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 14/20] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 15/20] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 1:45 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-22 15:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 16/20] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 17/20] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 18/20] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-06-24 21:52 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-25 10:23 ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2009-06-25 12:55 ` [PATCH] io-controller: do some changes of io.policy interface Vivek Goyal
2009-06-26 0:27 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 0:59 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 19/20] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-06-19 20:37 ` [PATCH 20/20] io-controller: experimental debug patch for async queue wait before expiry Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 7:44 ` [PATCH] io-controller: Preempt a non-rt queue if a rt ioq is present in ancestor or sibling groups Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-22 17:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 6:44 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-23 14:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-24 9:20 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] io-controller: Prepare a rt ioq list in efqd to keep track of busy rt ioqs Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 8:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] io-controller: make rt preemption happen in the whole hierarchy Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-26 12:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-21 15:21 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5) Balbir Singh
2009-06-22 15:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 15:40 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-22 16:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-22 16:06 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-06-22 17:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-23 6:52 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-29 16:04 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2009-06-29 17:23 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A435038.60406@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=nauman@google.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox