From: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"linux.kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 regression: ATA bus errors on resume
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:25:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4396E9.1030509@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A437442.8000909@gmail.com>
On 06/25/2009 02:57 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Sorry about the long delay.
>
> The result is perfectly good and yeah dump_stack() on the issue path
> would help but the problem is that block IO requests are processed
> asynchronously so by the time we find out which request fail, the
> requester stack is long gone. We can either record the stack trace
> with each request or trace it back one step at a time by chasing down
> the completion callbacks. The first requires more coding, so... :-)
>
> Looks like the request gotta be coming from __breadahead(). The only
> place this is used in ext4 is in __ext4_get_inode_loc(). Ah.. it also
> contains the matching error message. I still don't see how the READA
> buffer reads can affect the synchronous path. They're doing proper
> exclusion via buffer lock. Maybe they're getting merged? Yeap, looks
> like block code is merging READAs and regular READs.
>
> Can you please try the attached patch and reproduce the problem and
> report the kernel log? Hopefully, this will be the last debug run.
>
Hi Tejun,
I've recently switched my root partition from OpenSUSE 11.1 to Fedora 11
and since then I've not again seen the issue. I'm still using vanilla
2.6.30 generated with the same .config and EXT4 as before, so I have no
idea why I cannot reproduce the issue. I still use hibernate + sleep
frequently, and I just checked - I have 5 days uptime with a mount count
of 20 and the file-system is still clean.
The one big difference is that my original partition was a EXT2 -> EXT3
-> EXT4 upgrade job over a long period of time, and some of the EXT4
parameters now used by Fedora 11 on the reformatted root partition are
different from what I had then. Here is a summary of the differences in
case it matters at all:
Current settings:
Default mount options: user_xattr acl
Inodes per group: 8192
Inode blocks per group: 512
Flex block group size: 16
Required extra isize: 28
Desired extra isize: 28
Default directory hash: half_md4
Previous settings:
Default mount options: (none)
Inodes per group: 8176
Inode blocks per group: 511
Default directory hash: tea
If I do notice any such errors again I'll apply the debug patch and let
you know, but it does seem as if the upgrade made this issue disappear...
Regards,
Niel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <clqON-2Xv-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <clqON-2Xv-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <clqON-2Xv-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <clqON-2Xv-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <clqON-2Xv-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <clqON-2Xv-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <clqON-2Xv-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <clqON-2Xv-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <clqYt-3bu-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-03-30 18:24 ` 2.6.29 regression: ATA bus errors on resume Niel Lambrechts
2009-03-30 19:17 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] ` <cmknZ-8lW-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cmoBl-6Ok-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cmp4n-7rb-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cmsYg-5BR-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cmvW7-1Yj-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cnheh-3vO-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cnPg1-7Q4-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cnTWo-7bV-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <co1Kd-350-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <co2Qf-4QQ-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <co4yj-7Mc-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cp71c-4py-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cEVyE-re-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-05-23 9:36 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-05-25 1:10 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-25 8:15 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-25 22:06 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-05-26 4:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-26 5:43 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-05-26 5:50 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-26 6:13 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-05-26 13:33 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-26 18:14 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-05-27 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-27 14:01 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-06-01 18:57 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-06-03 3:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-03 4:28 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-06 7:05 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-06-19 15:04 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-25 12:57 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-25 15:25 ` Niel Lambrechts [this message]
2009-06-26 0:46 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-26 6:24 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-09-18 20:26 ` Berthold Gunreben
2009-09-25 4:11 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-30 9:58 ` Berthold Gunreben
2009-09-30 10:26 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-26 4:58 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <ckpL0-3TE-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <ckpL0-3TE-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <ckpL0-3TE-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <ckpL0-3TE-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <ckpL0-3TE-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <ckpL0-3TE-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cllvN-2Gf-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-03-30 14:30 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-03-30 14:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-01 19:48 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-04-03 20:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-03 20:54 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-04-02 1:50 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-02 6:20 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-04-02 6:52 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-02 11:03 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-04-02 14:15 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-04-04 4:54 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-06 5:01 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-04-06 10:09 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-06 18:23 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-04-06 19:39 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-06 21:26 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-04-09 18:18 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-23 9:17 ` Niel Lambrechts
[not found] <cjtH6-3Ll-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cjtH6-3Ll-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cjtH6-3Ll-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cjutt-577-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cjJCb-47c-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-03-27 19:10 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-03-27 22:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-28 10:22 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-03-28 14:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-30 8:43 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-30 8:55 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] <cjlqb-7sp-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <cjq6y-6sq-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-03-25 5:19 ` 2.6.29 regression: ATA bus errors on resume (was: EXT4: __ext4_get_inode_loc errors after s2disk) Niel Lambrechts
2009-03-25 6:06 ` 2.6.29 regression: ATA bus errors on resume Jeff Garzik
2009-03-25 21:40 ` Niel Lambrechts
2009-03-25 22:16 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4396E9.1030509@gmail.com \
--to=niel.lambrechts@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).