public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] x86: introduce a set of platform feature flags
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:04:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A451BA4.4090000@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090626154731.GA3153@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Btw., this enumeration of basic PC features isnt bad in itself - and 
> if there's a boot-flag based detection method (like on MRST) then 
> this can convey a 'should this platform driver attempt to 
> initialize' information to the driver, and rather cleanly so.
> 

That is the whole point of this, yes.  Furthermore, it is expected that
we *also* would be able to set platform flags based on early probes.

> But there's bad uses of this as well, and those bad uses seem to 
> dominate this patch-set.

Not entirely surprising, since this stuff is more or less randomly
sprinkled through the existing code.  We have a huge bunch of legacy
code and yes, it needs cleanup.

This is a huge opportunity, of course, but it's going to be a lot of
work.  A lot of this is likely to overlap directly with the needs of
Xen, too.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-26 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-26  0:14 [PATCH 2/9] x86: introduce a set of platform feature flags Pan, Jacob jun
2009-06-26  7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-26  9:14   ` Alan Cox
2009-06-26  9:45     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-26 10:17       ` Alan Cox
2009-06-26 10:47         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-26 11:41           ` Alan Cox
2009-06-26 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-26 19:04   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-06-26 19:13     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30  6:32 ` Pavel Machek
2009-07-02 23:09   ` Pan, Jacob jun
2009-07-02 23:25     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A451BA4.4090000@linux.intel.com \
    --to=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox