From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: pci_stub and kvm
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:49:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4B1522.1090000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440906302118oa181b2fm9599137bb2314129@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/01/2009 07:18 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> [ 1966.343286]
> [ 1966.343288] =======================================================
> [ 1966.356756] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [ 1966.356759] 2.6.31-rc1-tip-00978-g99123e5-dirty #438
> [ 1966.356761] -------------------------------------------------------
> [ 1966.356764] events/0/387 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 1966.356766] (&kvm->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8100af27>]
> kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler+0x42/0x13a
> [ 1966.356786]
> [ 1966.356787] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 1966.356789] (&match->interrupt_work){+.+...}, at:
> [<ffffffff810986e9>] worker_thread+0x175/0x2f6
> [ 1966.356797]
> [ 1966.356798] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> [ 1966.356799]
> [ 1966.356800]
> [ 1966.356801] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> [ 1966.356803]
> [ 1966.356803] -> #1 (&match->interrupt_work){+.+...}:
> [ 1966.356809] [<ffffffff810b3bf6>] __lock_acquire+0x1396/0x1710
> [ 1966.356817] [<ffffffff810b403c>] lock_acquire+0xcc/0x104
> [ 1966.356821] [<ffffffff810994a8>] __cancel_work_timer+0x121/0x247
> [ 1966.356825] [<ffffffff8109962c>] cancel_work_sync+0x23/0x39
> [ 1966.356828] [<ffffffff8100b280>] kvm_deassign_irq+0xf1/0x183
> [ 1966.356832] [<ffffffff8100db6c>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x8c8/0xc1a
> [ 1966.356837] [<ffffffff81156e56>] vfs_ioctl+0x3e/0xa3
> [ 1966.356846] [<ffffffff8115741c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4be/0x511
> [ 1966.356850] [<ffffffff811574c5>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x8d
> [ 1966.356854] [<ffffffff81034fdb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 1966.356860] [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> [ 1966.356869]
> [ 1966.356870] -> #0 (&kvm->lock){+.+.+.}:
> [ 1966.356872] [<ffffffff810b392b>] __lock_acquire+0x10cb/0x1710
> [ 1966.356875] [<ffffffff810b403c>] lock_acquire+0xcc/0x104
> [ 1966.356878] [<ffffffff81cde487>] mutex_lock_nested+0x75/0x2fa
> [ 1966.356886] [<ffffffff8100af27>]
> kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler+0x42/0x13a
> [ 1966.356890] [<ffffffff81098743>] worker_thread+0x1cf/0x2f6
> [ 1966.356892] [<ffffffff8109e335>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0
> [ 1966.356899] [<ffffffff8103609a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [ 1966.356906] [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
This is already fixed in kvm.git. I'm not sure about merging it to
2.6.30 since the race is very rare and involves device assignment (which
is not very mainstream), while the fix touches the core kvm parts.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 4:18 pci_stub and kvm Yinghai Lu
2009-07-01 7:49 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-07-01 23:58 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4B1522.1090000@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox