From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Chris Verges <chrisv@cyberswitching.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adxl345 accelerometer hwmon driver
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:55:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4CBC5B.6040103@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090702132520.2e02959e@hyperion.delvare>
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:52:28 -0700, Chris Verges wrote:
>>> Probably it's about time to put an end to this and kick all
>>> accelerometer drivers out of drivers/hwmon.
>> Hi Jean,
>>
>> This actually makes a lot of sense. The remaining question is,
>> "To where do we kick them?"
>>
>> After reading Jonathan's iio.pdf, I'm all on-board with the
>> adxl345 driver being placed in this new subsystem. However,
>> IIO subsystem isn't released into the "vanilla" kernel yet.
>>
>> Until the IIO subsystem is finished and I can port the driver
>> into it, what's the appropriate place for the adxl345 to
>> reside? misc? A new directory?
>
> This is a very valid question, and the current situation probably is
> the result of it not having a simple answer.
>
> We could create drivers/accelerometer and move the drivers there for
> the time being. Or we can move them to drivers/misc until iio is
> merged. Honestly, it would be great if iio could be finally merged, it
> would help driver authors get their driver in good shape and in the
> right place right away. But I know Jonathan is busy and I can't blame
> him if things take time.
Just for info, the latest version went to lkml about a minute ago. So now
it's over to other people finding the time to review / comment. (and me
to reply / implement their suggestions).
Thanks,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-02 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Acn6eDhBoTUmzVqOSVGG9a2LiwqVrA==>
2009-07-01 18:17 ` [PATCH] adxl345 accelerometer hwmon driver Chris Verges
2009-07-01 19:10 ` [lm-sensors] " Jonathan Cameron
2009-07-01 19:19 ` Chris Verges
2009-07-01 20:13 ` Jean Delvare
2009-07-01 20:52 ` Chris Verges
2009-07-02 11:25 ` Jean Delvare
2009-07-02 13:55 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2009-07-02 8:04 ` Éric Piel
2009-07-01 19:33 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2009-07-02 17:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2009-07-02 17:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-02 17:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2009-07-02 18:12 ` Hennerich, Michael
2009-07-02 18:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-02 17:59 ` Hennerich, Michael
2009-08-14 11:05 ` XingChao Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4CBC5B.6040103@cam.ac.uk \
--to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=chrisv@cyberswitching.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox