From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1757895AbZGGN7x@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757895AbZGGN7x (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:59:53 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756583AbZGGN7o
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:59:44 -0400
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:44317 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756392AbZGGN7n (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:59:43 -0400
Message-ID: <4A535496.1070801@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:58:46 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
CC: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
       open-osd mailing-list <osd-dev@open-osd.org>
Subject: Re: [osd-dev] [GIT PULL] exofs/osd tree for 2.6.31
References: <4A3F45D5.4020600@panasas.com> <4A41F458.2050409@panasas.com> <4A522E57.7060101@panasas.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A522E57.7060101@panasas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 on srv5.dvmed.net summary:
	Content analysis details:   (-4.4 points, 5.0 required)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Benny Halevy wrote:
> Sorry for nagging.
> Is this going to be merged in 2.6.31 or wait for 2.6.32?
> Anything we can do to help it not fall between the cracks next time?

I guess Boaz just needs to resubmit the push to Linus?

His reply was probably not as clear as a regenerated pull request.

	Jeff