From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757578AbZGHVd6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:33:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755653AbZGHVdt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:33:49 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:46438 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755996AbZGHVdt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:33:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4A55109C.7040506@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:33:16 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cyrill Gorcunov CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Vegard Nossum , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86,apic -- don't forget to disconnect BSP discrete apic References: <20090708200741.GI5301@lenovo> In-Reply-To: <20090708200741.GI5301@lenovo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > In case of discrete APIC cpu_has_apic could be not set. > This leads to disconnect_bsp_APIC is not called where > it should. I thought we were going to turn on cpu_has_apic in this case? -hpa