linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Scott James Remnant <scott@canonical.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:01:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A555DA7.6020009@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6a2187b0907081931w7dcf2544m4b580f7841b80cf3@mail.gmail.com>

Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Randy Dunlap<randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> Without CONFIG_EMBEDDED ...
>>>   CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y
>> Under General Setup, Namespaces support
> 
> You're good. Thanks.
> 
>>> With CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y ...
>>>   # CONFIG_NAMESPACES is not set
>>>   CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y
>> Under Processor type and features, Memory split
> 
> This is one I'm having trouble with. When CONFIG_EMBEDED is not set, I
> can't find any "VMSPLIT" in .config, but when CONFIG_EMBEDDED is set,
> I'll have to choose the VMSPLIT option. Should I select VMSPLIT_3G?

Probably so, since that's the default.

> Here's what it says ...
> 
>   | Prompt: Memory split
>   |   Defined at arch/x86/Kconfig:1062
>   |   Depends on: EXPERIMENTAL && X86_32 && EMBEDDED
>   |   Location:
>   |     -> Processor type and features
>   |   Selected by: EXPERIMENTAL && X86_32 && EMBEDDED && m

arch/x86/Kconfig says:

choice
	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
	prompt "Memory split" if EMBEDDED
	default VMSPLIT_3G
	depends on X86_32
	---help---
	  Select the desired split between kernel and user memory.

	  If the address range available to the kernel is less than the
	  physical memory installed, the remaining memory will be available
	  as "high memory". Accessing high memory is a little more costly
	  than low memory, as it needs to be mapped into the kernel first.
	  Note that increasing the kernel address space limits the range
	  available to user programs, making the address space there
	  tighter.  Selecting anything other than the default 3G/1G split
	  will also likely make your kernel incompatible with binary-only
	  kernel modules.

	  If you are not absolutely sure what you are doing, leave this
	  option alone!

~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-09  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-23  5:11 can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded? Jeff Chua
2009-06-23  8:17 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-06-23 14:42 ` Greg KH
2009-06-23 15:29   ` Jeff Chua
2009-06-23 15:39     ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 10:54       ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-08 11:03         ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-08 11:20           ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-08 11:42             ` Scott James Remnant
2009-07-08 13:00             ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 13:52         ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 13:55           ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 14:04             ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 14:12               ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 14:56                 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 15:05                   ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 15:47                     ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 21:23                       ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-09  0:43                         ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09  1:59                           ` Randy Dunlap
2009-07-09  2:31                             ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09  3:01                               ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-07-09 12:12                                 ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09  1:33                         ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 15:12               ` Bill Nottingham
2009-07-08 15:44                 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A555DA7.6020009@oracle.com \
    --to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott@canonical.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).