From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
tony.luck@intel.com, Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce export symbol CRC table size on 64-bit archs
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:36:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A575202.40407@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A57089B0200007800009C0E@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> Actually I meanwhile think that module-init-tools can easily detect the changed
> layout without any further kernel side adjustments: Since it is known that a
> CRC always is a 32-bit value, simply checking whether the so-far-used 64-bit
> value has more than 32 significant bits should suffice: If so, the new layout
> is being used (with the symbol name starting at offset 4), else the old one is
> in effect (name at offset 8). This ought to be a pretty trivial change to that
> code.
>
If we're changing module-init-tools, it seems changing the section name
would be cleaner anyway.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-10 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-30 11:51 [PATCH] reduce export symbol CRC table size on 64-bit archs Jan Beulich
2009-06-30 22:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 5:00 ` Rusty Russell
2009-07-01 7:00 ` Jan Beulich
2009-07-03 20:16 ` Michal Marek
2009-07-06 7:42 ` Jan Beulich
2009-07-09 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
2009-07-10 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
2009-07-10 14:36 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-07-10 15:50 ` Jon Masters
2009-07-13 8:11 ` Michal Marek
2009-07-13 8:44 ` Jan Beulich
2009-07-14 10:29 ` Jon Masters
2009-07-14 10:44 ` Marco d'Itri
2009-07-14 16:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A575202.40407@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox