public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Ben Blum <bblum@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	serue@us.ibm.com, menage@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Quick vmalloc vs kmalloc fix to the case where array size	is too large
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:03:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5AA3E7.9070800@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090710230205.16778.11707.stgit@hastromil.mtv.corp.google.com>

Ben Blum wrote:
> Quick vmalloc vs kmalloc fix to the case where array size is too large
> 
> Separates all pidlist allocation requests to a separate function that judges
> based on the requested size whether or not the array needs to be vmalloced or
> can be gotten via kmalloc, and similar for kfree/vfree. Should be replaced
> entirely with a kernel-wide solution to this general problem.
> 
> Depends on cgroup-pidlist-namespace.patch, cgroup-procs.patch
> 

Since this is a patchset, you don't need to tell the dependencies of
this patch, at least not in changelog, but can put it ...

> Signed-off-by: Ben Blum <bblum@google.com>
> 
> ---
> 

... here

---  <- followed by this mark

>  kernel/cgroup.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 33d89be..0ed85fa 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>  #include <linux/namei.h>
>  #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
>  #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h> /* TODO: replace with more sophisticated array */
>  

Is this TODO different with the below one?

>  #include <asm/atomic.h>
>  
> @@ -2121,6 +2122,27 @@ int cgroup_scan_tasks(struct cgroup_scanner *scan)
>   */
>  
>  /*
> + * The following two functions "fix" the issue where there are more pids
> + * than kmalloc will give memory for; in such cases, we use vmalloc/vfree.
> + * TODO: replace with a kernel-wide solution to this problem
> + */
> +#define PIDLIST_TOO_LARGE(c) ((c) * sizeof(pid_t) > (PAGE_SIZE * 2))

I think order-0 is most robust and should be used as much as possible.

> +static inline void *pidlist_allocate(int count)

It's better to let gcc decide to inline it or not.

> +{
> +	if (PIDLIST_TOO_LARGE(count))
> +		return vmalloc(count * sizeof(pid_t));
> +	else
> +		return kmalloc(count * sizeof(pid_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> +}
> +static inline void pidlist_free(void *p)

ditto

> +{
> +	if (is_vmalloc_addr(p))
> +		vfree(p);
> +	else
> +		kfree(p);
> +}
> +

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-13  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-10 23:01 [PATCH v2 0/3] CGroups: cgroup member list enhancement/fix Ben Blum
2009-07-10 23:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] Adds a read-only "procs" file similar to "tasks" that shows only unique tgids Ben Blum
2009-07-13  3:46   ` Li Zefan
2009-07-13 15:25     ` Benjamin Blum
2009-07-14 18:34   ` Dave Hansen
2009-07-14 21:26     ` Benjamin Blum
2009-07-14 21:49       ` Dave Hansen
2009-07-14 22:55         ` Benjamin Blum
2009-07-15  1:31         ` Li Zefan
2009-07-10 23:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] Ensures correct concurrent opening/reading of pidlists across pid namespaces Ben Blum
2009-07-11 21:59   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-07-10 23:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] Quick vmalloc vs kmalloc fix to the case where array size is too large Ben Blum
2009-07-13  3:03   ` Li Zefan [this message]
2009-07-13  6:03     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-13 15:27       ` Benjamin Blum
2009-07-13 23:49         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-14  3:50           ` Paul Menage
2009-07-14  3:53             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-14  4:04               ` Paul Menage
2009-07-14  4:25                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-14 17:26                   ` Benjamin Blum
2009-07-14 17:28                   ` Paul Menage
2009-07-14 17:47                     ` Dave Hansen
2009-07-14 17:50                       ` Paul Menage
2009-07-14 21:30                         ` Benjamin Blum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A5AA3E7.9070800@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bblum@google.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox