public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Danny Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] block: sysfs fix mismatched queue_var_{store,show} in 64bit kernel
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:39:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A602AA1.70908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A601ED2.50800@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1953 bytes --]

Hello, Tejun:

     Thank you very much for the review, I've attached v3 patch follow 
your advices, please help me review.

     Another thing on block sysfs is that we can echo some invalid value 
(e.g 123abc), should sysfs return -EINVAL for those?

Regards

On 07/17/2009 02:48 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Xiaotian.
>
> Xiaotian Feng wrote:
>>   static ssize_t queue_ra_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
>>   {
>> -	int ra_kb = q->backing_dev_info.ra_pages<<  (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - 10);
>> +	unsigned long ra_kb = q->backing_dev_info.ra_pages<<
>> +					(PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - 10);
>>
>>   	return queue_var_show(ra_kb, (page));
>>   }
>
> Nice.
>
>> @@ -95,7 +96,7 @@ queue_ra_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, size_t count)
>>
>>   static ssize_t queue_max_sectors_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
>>   {
>> -	int max_sectors_kb = queue_max_sectors(q)>>  1;
>> +	unsigned long max_sectors_kb = queue_max_sectors(q)>>  1;
>>
>>   	return queue_var_show(max_sectors_kb, (page));
>>   }
>> @@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ queue_max_sectors_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, size_t count)
>>
>>   static ssize_t queue_max_hw_sectors_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
>>   {
>> -	int max_hw_sectors_kb = queue_max_hw_sectors(q)>>  1;
>> +	unsigned long max_hw_sectors_kb = queue_max_hw_sectors(q)>>  1;
>>
>>   	return queue_var_show(max_hw_sectors_kb, (page));
>>   }
>
> The above two aren't necessary but well why not.
>
>> @@ -189,7 +190,7 @@ static ssize_t queue_nomerges_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page,
>>
>>   static ssize_t queue_rq_affinity_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
>>   {
>> -	unsigned int set = test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP,&q->queue_flags);
>> +	unsigned long set = test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP,&q->queue_flags);
>>
>>   	return queue_var_show(set != 0, page);
>>   }
>
> Wouldn't it be better to make it "bool set = " and then remove the
> "!= 0"?
>
> Thanks.
>


[-- Attachment #2: 0001--block-sysfs-fix-mismatched-queue_var_-store-show.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1816 bytes --]

>From c3c0a8a6db9ff124d700b6d4ebf56bb4069f42c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:26:26 +0800
Subject: [PATCH V3] block: sysfs fix mismatched queue_var_{store,show} in 64bit kernel

In blk-sysfs.c, queue_var_store uses unsigned long to store data,
but queue_var_show uses unsigned int to show data. This causes,

	# echo 70000000000 > /sys/block/<dev>/queue/read_ahead_kb
	# cat /sys/block/<dev>/queue/read_ahead_kb => get wrong value

Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-sysfs.c |   11 ++++++-----
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
index b1cd040..418d636 100644
--- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ struct queue_sysfs_entry {
 };
 
 static ssize_t
-queue_var_show(unsigned int var, char *page)
+queue_var_show(unsigned long var, char *page)
 {
-	return sprintf(page, "%d\n", var);
+	return sprintf(page, "%lu\n", var);
 }
 
 static ssize_t
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ queue_requests_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, size_t count)
 
 static ssize_t queue_ra_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
 {
-	int ra_kb = q->backing_dev_info.ra_pages << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - 10);
+	unsigned long ra_kb = q->backing_dev_info.ra_pages <<
+					(PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - 10);
 
 	return queue_var_show(ra_kb, (page));
 }
@@ -189,9 +190,9 @@ static ssize_t queue_nomerges_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page,
 
 static ssize_t queue_rq_affinity_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
 {
-	unsigned int set = test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &q->queue_flags);
+	bool set = test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &q->queue_flags);
 
-	return queue_var_show(set != 0, page);
+	return queue_var_show(set, page);
 }
 
 static ssize_t
-- 
1.6.2.5


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-17  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-14 11:56 [PATCH] block: sysfs fix mismatched queue_var_{store,show} in 64bit kernel Xiaotian Feng
2009-07-14 13:53 ` Américo Wang
2009-07-14 15:00   ` Danny Feng
2009-07-14 14:10 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-14 14:15 ` [PATCH V2] " Xiaotian Feng
2009-07-17  6:48   ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-17  7:39     ` Danny Feng [this message]
2009-07-17  7:53       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A602AA1.70908@redhat.com \
    --to=dfeng@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox