From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] tty (or char) bus?
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:19:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A631D5A.3030105@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090717175428.GB4852@const.linuxsymposium.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1958 bytes --]
Scripsit Samuel Thibault die 17.07.2009 19:54:
> Janusz Krzysztofik, le Tue 14 Jul 2009 17:31:23 +0200, a écrit :
>> AFAICS, even if tty lowlevel write() could be used unmodified, a
>> convenient way of reading characters from a tty is missing and should
>> be implemented in a line discipline. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Have you seen the receive_buf line discipline hook? Indeed it's not a
> read() operation as from userland, but at least you can get the data
> from the tty that way.
That's as it should be. A read() operation that sleeps until some data
is available isn't very useful in kernel mode, as it can only be used
if you have the ability to sleep. A callback function which runs your
code as soon as the data arrives is a much better fit, although of
course it requires a bit of rethinking.
>> OTOH, I found that some kind of abstraction layer for acccessing devices
>> over a tty could be convenient. Instead of allocating a new line
>> discipline for each specific device, sometimes found on a specific board
>> only, why not just create a new bus type?
>
> I'd tend to agree with you, as I also have a use case for that: braille
> & speech synthesis devices. However for now I haven't found a really
> convincing argument why line disciplines aren't enough.
I was in the same situation three years ago when I implemented the
ser_gigaset driver for an RS232 connected ISDN adapter, and found the
line discipline (LD) interface quite adequate once I had figured out
how to use it. The only inconvenience is how LDs are loaded and
attached to a serial interface, via the TIOCSETD ioctl, because you
need a userspace daemon which keeps the tty device open so that the
LD stays attached to it.
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-19 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-14 15:31 [RFC] tty (or char) bus? Janusz Krzysztofik
2009-07-17 17:54 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-07-19 13:19 ` Tilman Schmidt [this message]
2009-07-19 13:34 ` Samuel Thibault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A631D5A.3030105@imap.cc \
--to=tilman@imap.cc \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox