public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS ML <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc3 nfsv4 client regression (oops)
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:08:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A664A76.5000902@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247571788.19099.32.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>

Trond Myklebust wrote:
> NFSv4: Fix an Oops in nfs4_free_lock_state
> 
> The oops http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=537858&msgid= appears to
> be due to the nfs4_lock_state->ls_state field being uninitialised. This
> happens if the call to nfs4_free_lock_state() is triggered at the end of
> nfs4_get_lock_state().
> 
> The fixe is to move the initialisation of ls_state into the allocator.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> ---
> 
>  fs/nfs/nfs4state.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> index b73c5a7..65ca8c1 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> @@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ static struct nfs4_lock_state *nfs4_alloc_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, f
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lsp->ls_sequence.list);
>  	lsp->ls_seqid.sequence = &lsp->ls_sequence;
>  	atomic_set(&lsp->ls_count, 1);
> +	lsp->ls_state = state;
>  	lsp->ls_owner = fl_owner;
>  	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
>  	nfs_alloc_unique_id(&clp->cl_lockowner_id, &lsp->ls_id, 1, 64);
> @@ -587,7 +588,6 @@ static struct nfs4_lock_state *nfs4_get_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, fl_
>  		if (lsp != NULL)
>  			break;
>  		if (new != NULL) {
> -			new->ls_state = state;
>  			list_add(&new->ls_locks, &state->lock_states);
>  			set_bit(LK_STATE_IN_USE, &state->flags);

Ping?  This is headed upstream, right?

This oops fix has lived outside the tree for at least a week now, and 
IMO needs to move upstream...

	Jeff




      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-21 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-14  7:48 2.6.31-rc3 nfsv4 client regression (oops) Jeff Garzik
2009-07-14 11:43 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-07-15  1:19   ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-21 23:08   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A664A76.5000902@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox