From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] genirq fixes for 2.6.31
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:33:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A67A1D1.8040201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A67A0A2.40503@gmail.com>
Kevin Winchester wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> +/*
>> * Interrupt handler thread
>> */
>> static int irq_thread(void *data)
>> @@ -458,6 +494,8 @@ static int irq_thread(void *data)
>>
>> while (!irq_wait_for_interrupt(action)) {
>>
>> + irq_thread_check_affinity(desc, action);
>> +
>> atomic_inc(&desc->threads_active);
>>
>> spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
>
> Any chance we could do this in a way that doesn't break the build for CONFIG_SMP=n? :)
>
> Should this call simply be wrapped in an #ifdef, or should the function be defined for !SMP?
>
Actually, I guess the function is defined always, but it references desc->affinity unconditionally.
Perhaps something like the following (likely whitespace damaged) patch:
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index f0de36f..353e335 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -451,6 +451,8 @@ static int irq_wait_for_interrupt(struct irqaction *action)
return -1;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
/*
* Check whether we need to change the affinity of the interrupt thread.
*/
@@ -479,6 +481,15 @@ irq_thread_check_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
free_cpumask_var(mask);
}
+#else
+
+static void
+irq_thread_check_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
+{
+}
+
+#endif
+
/*
* Interrupt handler thread
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-22 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-22 14:56 [GIT pull] genirq fixes for 2.6.31 Thomas Gleixner
2009-07-22 23:28 ` Kevin Winchester
2009-07-22 23:33 ` Kevin Winchester [this message]
2009-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH] irq: Add compiling definition of irq_thread_check_affinity for !CONFIG_SMP Kevin Winchester
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-13 19:02 [GIT pull] genirq fixes for 2.6.31 Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-13 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-13 19:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-13 19:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-13 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-13 20:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A67A1D1.8040201@gmail.com \
--to=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox