From: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, hch@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Paul.Clements@steeleye.com, tytso@mit.edu,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, miklos <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow userspace block device implementation
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:46:57 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A6E0431.30000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090727142536.465799aa@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Alan Cox wrote:
>> Somehow this made me think of FUSE/CUSE... should this be named aBUSE?
>> Oh wait it is :-), what I'm after is I guess is, can we share some of
>> the FUSE/CUSE code?
Well, it is A Block device in User SpacE :) I don't think there is a
lot of code sharing benefit in some 800 odd lines, but I could be wrong.
> It reminds me of the existing and perfectly functional network block
> device (nbd) we already have and which has also been present for years.
Yes, I agree, in fact I looked at nbd as I was writing this, but I
believe it is different enough to warrant further investigation.
The network block device requires access to a socket, which the code at
least seems to imply brings up the potential for deadlocks when
self-hosting. This was designed to explicitly support self-hosting.
This device can be used without CONFIG_NET (not a big advantage, I
agree), and is completely connectionless, which I would argue is a big
advantage.
NBD is perfectly functional, but it seemed more complicated than
necessary for a purely local implementation. A fully functional null
server (just returns zeros, full error checking and normal whitespace)
can be implemented in about 60 lines of C code, which I don't think is
the case for NBD. Of course, I'm sure it is possible with PERL bindings
as a one-liner, but the fundamental argument isn't about lines, it's
about complexity. NBD requires socket allocation, listening and
connection; this requires only opening of a device node.
Can you swap over NBD? Assuming one had pinned the userspace program
and it pre-allocated all memory so no pagein / alloc was required, would
it be deadlock proof? I believe there are structure allocations
required for the socket implementation that go beyond the basic BIO
allocations, therefore making it impossible. In /theory/, one should be
able to swap over this device. In practice, it's probably a really bad
idea.
It seems then that NBD is a strict subset of the functionality provided
by this type of module.
Zach
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 9:57 [PATCH] Allow userspace block device implementation Zachary Amsden
2009-07-27 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-27 13:25 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-27 19:46 ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
2009-07-27 20:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-27 21:02 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 1:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-28 3:53 ` Zachary Amsden
2009-07-28 10:27 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 18:36 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-07-28 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 19:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 19:49 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-28 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 21:09 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-28 22:56 ` Theodore Tso
2009-08-07 18:08 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-10 22:47 ` Zachary Amsden
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-28 20:37 devzero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A6E0431.30000@redhat.com \
--to=zamsden@redhat.com \
--cc=Paul.Clements@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox