linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	jens.axboe@oracle.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
	paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
	fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
	m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, jbaron@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com,
	snitzer@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:36:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A6E7253.9050906@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090728032712.GC3620@redhat.com>

Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:55:03AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:10:34AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here are some fio test results for IO Controller V6 built and not built.
>>> Iozone test results are also attached.
>>>
>> Hi Gui,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for some performance numbers. It seems to be a mixed chart.
>> Performance gains at some places and loss at others. I am curious about
>> that -7.0% for normal writes. Not sure what can contribute to that.
>>
> 
> Gui, can you also try with CONFIG_TRACK_ASYNC_CONTEXT=n and see if it improves
> buffered write performance.

  Hi Vivek,

  Ok, I'll do it, and i'll do the performance test for IO Controller V7, and post
  the results as soon as i get them.

> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
>> What was the value of "fairness" parameter when you ran those tests? Can you
>> please set fairness = 0 and re-run the tests (if you have already not done so).
>>
>> By default fairness is set to 1 in V6. With fairness = 0, we should be very
>> close to existing CFQ behavior. If not, then we need to dive deeper and
>> see why variations are happening.
>>
>> Is it also possible to run the same tests with V7. 
>>
>> Thanks
>> Vivek
>>
>>> Arch: X86
>>> Mem:  1G
>>> Disk: 320G
>>> IO Scheduler: CFQ
>>>
>>> ============
>>> By normal read and write syscall.
>>>
>>> Block Size:32K
>>> File Size: 1G * 10
>>>
>>> Mode                    Normal read   |   Random read   |   Normal write   |   Random write | Direct read | Direct write
>>>
>>> 2.6.31-rc1              47,932KiB/s       3,566KiB/s        45,693KiB/s        8,501KiB/s     50,088KiB/s   43,473KiB/s
>>>
>>> 2.6.31-rc1-Vivek-V6     47,231KiB/s       3,411KiB/s        42,451KiB/s        8,714KiB/s     51,284KiB/s   42,341KiB/s
>>>
>>> Performance             -1.5%             -4.4%             -7.0%              +2.5%          +2.4%         -2.6%
>>>
>>> ============
>>>
>>> By mmap.
>>>
>>> Block Size:32K
>>> File Size: 500M
>>>
>>> Mode                    Normal read   |   Random read   |   Normal write   |   Random write
>>>
>>> 2.6.31-rc1              49,951KiB/s       3,245KiB/s        21,950KiB/s        2,771KiB/s
>>>
>>> 2.6.31-rc1-Vivek-V6     49,951KiB/s       3,154KiB/s        22,593KiB/s        2,648KiB/s
>>>
>>> Performance             0%                -2.8%             +2.9%              -4.4%
>>>
>>> ============
>>>  
>>> By libaio calls
>>>
>>> Block Size:32K
>>> File Size: 500M
>>>
>>> Mode                    Normal read   |  Random read   |   Normal write   |   Random write
>>>
>>> 2.6.31-rc1              49,447KiB/s       3,296KiB/s        57,519KiB/s        21,093KiB/s
>>>
>>> 2.6.31-rc1-Vivek-V6     50,142KiB/s       3,238KiB/s        57,791KiB/s        21,283KiB/s
>>>
>>> Performance             +1.4%             -1.8%             0%                 +0.1%
>>>
>>> ============
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Regards
Gui Jianfeng


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-28  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-02 20:01 [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 01/25] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 02/25] io-controller: Core of the B-WF2Q+ scheduler Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 03/25] io-controller: bfq support of in-class preemption Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 04/25] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 05/25] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 06/25] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 07/25] io-controller: core bfq scheduler changes for hierarchical setup Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 08/25] io-controller: cgroup related changes for hierarchical group support Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 09/25] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-06  2:46   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-06 14:16     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-07  1:40       ` [PATCH] io-controller: Get rid of css id from io cgroup Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 14:04         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 10/25] io-controller: cfq changes to use hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 11/25] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08  2:16   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 14:00     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 12/25] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 13/25] io-controller: Wait for requests to complete from last queue before new queue is scheduled Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:09   ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-02 20:17     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 14/25] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 15/25] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 16/25] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 17/25] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 18/25] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 19/25] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 20/25] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-08-03  2:13   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04  1:25     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 21/25] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08  3:27   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 13:57     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-21  5:37   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-21  5:55     ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-21 14:01       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-21 17:57         ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 22/25] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal
2009-07-17  0:16   ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-17 13:52     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 23/25] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 24/25] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 25/25] io-controller: experimental debug patch for async queue wait before expiry Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08  3:56 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Balbir Singh
2009-07-08 13:41   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 14:39     ` Balbir Singh
2009-07-09  1:58       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-10  1:56 ` [PATCH] io-controller: implement per group request allocation limitation Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-13 16:03   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-13 21:08     ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-14  7:45       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04  2:00         ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04  6:38           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 22:37           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-14  7:37     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04  2:02   ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04  6:41     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04  2:04   ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04  6:45     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-27  2:10 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-27 12:55   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-28  3:27     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-28  3:36       ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2009-07-28 11:36     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-29  9:07     ` Gui Jianfeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A6E7253.9050906@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpshah@google.com \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).