From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755496AbZG2N1c (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:27:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755475AbZG2N1b (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:27:31 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:60518 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755204AbZG2N1a (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:27:30 -0400 Message-ID: <4A704F5B.9000800@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:32:11 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Roedel CC: Alexander Graf , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] Nested SVM cleanups References: <1248872192-30881-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <4A70492E.2080705@redhat.com> <20090729130944.GE18313@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20090729130944.GE18313@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/29/2009 04:09 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> I seem to recall nested smp used to be broken. Am I mistaken, or do >> these patches fix rather than clean up? >> > > Nested SMP was broken in one of the early version of the nested SVM > code. In the current upstream version it works quite well. > In that case, the next interesting target is nested npt. This may actually make nsvm perform well. Any plans? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function