From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Rosenboom <jens@mcbone.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@us.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Subject: [ PATCH] execve: must clear current->clear_child_tid
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:00:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A72C0A3.1070508@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A702AC2.2060003@gmail.com>
While looking at Jens Rosenboom bug report about strange sys_futex call done
from a dying "ps" program, we found following problem.
clone() syscall has special support for TID of created threads.
This support includes two features.
One (CLONE_CHILD_SETTID) is to set an integer into user memory
with the TID value.
One (CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID) is to clear this same integer once
the created thread dies.
The integer location is a user provided pointer, provided at clone()
time.
kernel keeps this pointer value into current->clear_child_tid.
At execve() time, we should make sure kernel doesnt keep
this user provided pointer, as full user memory is replaced by a new one.
As glibc fork() actually uses clone() syscall with CLONE_CHILD_SETTID
and CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID set, chances are high that we might corrupt
user memory in forked processes.
Following sequence could happen:
1) bash (or any program) starts a new process, by a fork() call
that glibc maps to a clone( ... CLONE_CHILD_SETTID
| CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID ...) syscall
2) When new process starts, its current->clear_child_tid is set to a location
that has a meaning only in bash (or initial program) context (&THREAD_SELF->tid)
3) This new process does the execve() syscall to start a new program.
current->clear_child_tid is left unchanged (a non NULL value)
4) If this new program creates some threads, and initial thread exits,
kernel will attempt to clear the integer pointed by current->clear_child_tid
from mm_release() :
if (tsk->clear_child_tid
&& !(tsk->flags & PF_SIGNALED)
&& atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1) {
u32 __user * tidptr = tsk->clear_child_tid;
tsk->clear_child_tid = NULL;
/*
* We don't check the error code - if userspace has
* not set up a proper pointer then tough luck.
*/
<< here >> put_user(0, tidptr);
sys_futex(tidptr, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, NULL, NULL, 0);
}
5) OR : if new program is not multi-threaded, but spied by /proc/pid users
(ps command for example), mm_users > 1, and the exiting program could
corrupt 4 bytes in a persistent memory area (shm or memory mapped file)
If current->clear_child_tid points to a writeable portion of memory
of the new program, kernel happily and silently corrupts 4 bytes of memory,
with unexpected effects.
Fix is straightforward and should not break any sane program.
Reported-by: Jens Rosenboom <jens@mcbone.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jens Rosenboom <jens@mcbone.net>
---
fs/compat.c | 1 +
fs/exec.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/compat.c b/fs/compat.c
index 94502da..deb1049 100644
--- a/fs/compat.c
+++ b/fs/compat.c
@@ -1550,6 +1550,7 @@ int compat_do_execve(char * filename,
mutex_unlock(¤t->cred_guard_mutex);
acct_update_integrals(current);
free_bprm(bprm);
+ current->clear_child_tid = NULL;
if (displaced)
put_files_struct(displaced);
return retval;
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 4a8849e..e275652 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1343,6 +1343,7 @@ int do_execve(char * filename,
mutex_unlock(¤t->cred_guard_mutex);
acct_update_integrals(current);
free_bprm(bprm);
+ current->clear_child_tid = NULL;
if (displaced)
put_files_struct(displaced);
return retval;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-31 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 8:00 futexes: Still infinite loop in get_futex_key() in 2.6.31-rc4 Jens Rosenboom
2009-07-27 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-27 12:16 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-07-27 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-27 12:45 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-07-27 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-27 13:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-27 14:00 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-07-27 16:00 ` Ray Lee
2009-07-29 6:22 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-07-29 9:57 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-07-29 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-29 10:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-29 10:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-29 14:29 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-07-30 14:13 ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-07-31 10:00 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A72C0A3.1070508@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=jens@mcbone.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox