From: "Thomas Hellström" <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>
Cc: "dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ttm: Fix a potential comparison of structs.
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:12:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A75D702.6010804@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090802203643.5b638eb6@iki.fi>
Pekka Paalanen skrev:
> From 5e2851952729b287a82efa002b28a2095404d44d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:47:51 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ttm: Fix a potential comparison of structs.
>
> On some architectures the comparison may cause a compilation failure.
>
> Original partial fix Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>
> ---
>
> Thomas, you forgot two more of these :-)
> Here's a patch that actually compiles on x86_64.
>
Pekka,
Thanks for fixing this! (Just for clarity, i assume you mean that the
non-x86 part now compiles on x86?)
Dave, is there a chance to have this in 2.6.31? Compilation errors are
bad, although probably nobody has been hitting this yet..
/Thomas
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> index f4e2eba..999fbe7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int ttm_copy_io_ttm_page(struct ttm_tt *ttm, void *src,
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> dst = kmap_atomic_prot(d, KM_USER0, prot);
> #else
> - if (prot != PAGE_KERNEL)
> + if (pgprot_val(prot) != pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL))
> dst = vmap(&d, 1, 0, prot);
> else
> dst = kmap(d);
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int ttm_copy_io_ttm_page(struct ttm_tt *ttm, void *src,
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> kunmap_atomic(dst, KM_USER0);
> #else
> - if (prot != PAGE_KERNEL)
> + if (pgprot_val(prot) != pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL))
> vunmap(dst);
> else
> kunmap(d);
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static int ttm_copy_ttm_io_page(struct ttm_tt *ttm, void *dst,
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> src = kmap_atomic_prot(s, KM_USER0, prot);
> #else
> - if (prot != PAGE_KERNEL)
> + if (pgprot_val(prot) != pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL))
> src = vmap(&s, 1, 0, prot);
> else
> src = kmap(s);
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int ttm_copy_ttm_io_page(struct ttm_tt *ttm, void *dst,
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> kunmap_atomic(src, KM_USER0);
> #else
> - if (prot != PAGE_KERNEL)
> + if (pgprot_val(prot) != pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL))
> vunmap(src);
> else
> kunmap(s);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-02 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-31 8:47 [PATCH] ttm: Fix a potential comparison of structs Thomas Hellstrom
2009-08-02 17:36 ` Pekka Paalanen
2009-08-02 18:12 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2009-08-02 19:21 ` Pekka Paalanen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A75D702.6010804@vmware.com \
--to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pq@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox