Re: [GIT PULL] Additional x86 fixes for 2.6.31-rc5

Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03T02:16:10Z

On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Do you want to queue it for 2.6.31?

Yeah, no.

> Given that the generated code
> changes compared to the previous kernels (both pre and post percpu
> stuff), I think it would be safer to queue it for 2.6.32 window. I
> would be happy to carry it in the percpu tree.

Please do. I don't want it for 31, and I do want it to get more testing. I
ran with it for a few days, and saw no problems, and it looked obvious
enough, but there just isn't any overriding reason for it to be in 31.

Linus