From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1752901AbZHCFO6@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752901AbZHCFO6 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 01:14:58 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751979AbZHCFO5
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 01:14:57 -0400
Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:54968 "EHLO
	terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751738AbZHCFO5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 01:14:57 -0400
Message-ID: <4A767203.5090802@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:13:39 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Add 'percpu_read_stable()' interface for cacheable
 accesses
References: <200907311813.n6VIDe9S023442@voreg.hos.anvin.org> <alpine.LFD.2.01.0907311218080.3161@localhost.localdomain> <20090731195705.GA12270@elte.hu> <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908011214330.3304@localhost.localdomain> <4A76421E.3040005@kernel.org> <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908021913130.3352@localhost.localdomain> <4A7670E0.4030605@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A7670E0.4030605@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> Ingo, these patches might as well go through x86 tree.  If you think
> that would be better, please let me know.
> 

Makes sense to me.  I'll pull them into x86/percpu.

	-hpa