From: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@bigtelecom.ru>
To: "\"Chia-chi Yeh (葉家齊)\"" <chiachi@android.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
john.dykstra1@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Keep interface binding when sending packets with ipi_ifindex = 0
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:57:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A77E9FA.7030503@bigtelecom.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c039e090908040036j38666152y2db1d4c55529eaff@mail.gmail.com>
Chia-chi Yeh (葉家齊) пишет:
> After thinking more deeply, I believe that IPv6 does the right thing
> and IPv4 does not. SO_BINDTODEVICE requires CAP_NET_RAW, so it is a
> privileged operation. Therefore, it looks weird to me if one can
> specify other interface than the bound one without the same
> capability. The following patch makes the behavior in IPv4 and IPv6
> identical. Thanks for your help.
>
> Chia-chi
>
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c 2009-08-04 15:11:39.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c 2009-08-04 15:17:05.000000000 +0800
> @@ -213,7 +213,11 @@
> if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(struct
> in_pktinfo)))
> return -EINVAL;
> info = (struct in_pktinfo *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg);
> - ipc->oif = info->ipi_ifindex;
> + if (info->ipi_ifindex) {
> + if (ipc->oif && info->ipi_ifindex != ipc->oif)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + ipc->oif = info->ipi_ifindex;
Hello
Sorry if its my mistake or i someone not understand :)
if (ipc->oif && info->ipi_ifindex != ipc->oif)
// if match: info->ipi_ifindex != ipc->oif
return ...
else
// else match: info->ipi_ifindex == ipc->oif
// but you do
ipc->oif = info->ipi_ifindex;
// why if you else match allready check for it?
Thanks
> + }
> ipc->addr = info->ipi_spec_dst.s_addr;
> break;
> }
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:23 PM, David Miller<davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:10:21 -0500
>>
>>> I guess Dave's letting this stand. I'm posting this just to make sure
>>> this is an explicit decision.
>> I'm still thinking about this.
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-04 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-23 21:39 [PATCH] net: Keep interface binding when sending packets with ipi_ifindex = 0 Chia-chi Yeh (葉家齊)
2009-07-27 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-30 0:10 ` John Dykstra
2009-08-04 4:23 ` David Miller
2009-08-04 7:36 ` Chia-chi Yeh (葉家齊)
2009-08-04 7:57 ` Badalian Vyacheslav [this message]
2009-08-04 8:28 ` Chia-chi Yeh (葉家齊)
2009-08-04 18:57 ` David Miller
2009-08-05 0:06 ` Chia-chi Yeh (葉家齊)
2009-08-05 2:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A77E9FA.7030503@bigtelecom.ru \
--to=slavon@bigtelecom.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chiachi@android.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.dykstra1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox