public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>,
	Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Subject: Re: MMC: Make the configuration memory resource optional
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:07:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7975EB.7020903@mnementh.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec7e5c30908041908p568f413albef7dede3fd2cb83@mail.gmail.com>

Magnus Damm wrote:

> Sorry for not answering your question earlier. This may sound starnge,
> but I don't have any datasheet. I do however think that you can assume
> a 1:1 host/card clock capability, at least to begin with.

Im not so sure I can - the 1:1 clock on MFD is selected via the CNF IO 
area and as such the other users of the driver that dont have CNF areas 
cannot possibly be using this method. Do you have your own method for 
clock selection, or are you using the routine in tmio-mmc.c - if the 
latter then you are certainly not running a 1:1 clock

> So please use the clock framework to enable/disable the clock and get
> the rate, and we'll do our best to adjust the architecture code after
> that. And I'll cook up a patch for Runtime PM on top of that if that's
> ok with you.

I _cant_ use the clock framework by itself in tmio-mmc because that 
would break each and every MFD user of the driver.

-Ian

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-05 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-17 11:10 MMC: Make the configuration memory resource optional Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-07-17 14:19 ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-17 14:34   ` [PATCH] " Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-07-17 17:38     ` Ian Molton
2009-07-23 10:29     ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-28 13:55 ` Ian Molton
2009-07-29  2:48   ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-29 10:24     ` Ian Molton
2009-07-29 11:58     ` Mark Brown
2009-07-29 12:27       ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-29 12:35         ` Paul Mundt
2009-07-29 12:42         ` Mark Brown
2009-07-29 12:51           ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-29 12:58             ` Ian Molton
2009-07-29 13:08               ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-29 13:51                 ` Ian Molton
2009-07-29 20:17                   ` Paul Mundt
2009-07-29 20:55                     ` pHilipp Zabel
2009-07-29 21:03                       ` Paul Mundt
2009-07-30  9:59                       ` Ian Molton
2009-07-30 10:56                         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-07-30 19:21                           ` Ian Molton
2009-07-31  6:55                             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-08-03 18:51                               ` Ian Molton
2009-08-05 13:33                                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-08-05 14:10                                   ` Ian Molton
2009-08-03  2:52                             ` Magnus Damm
2009-08-04 18:21                               ` Ian Molton
2009-08-05  2:08                                 ` Magnus Damm
2009-08-05 12:07                                   ` Ian Molton [this message]
2009-08-05 13:34                                   ` Ian Molton
2009-08-05 19:44                                     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-08-05 22:34                                       ` Ian Molton
2009-08-05 22:53                                         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-08-05 23:06                                           ` Ian Molton
2009-08-18  8:40                                             ` Magnus Damm
2009-08-09 19:10                                       ` MMC / MFD / Clocks Ian Molton
2009-08-10  3:48                                         ` Magnus Damm
2009-08-05 14:02                                   ` Example idea for how to solve the clock/cnf problem Ian Molton
2009-08-05 22:43                                     ` Ian Molton
2009-09-02 10:44                                       ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-30 19:33                           ` MMC: Make the configuration memory resource optional Ian Molton
2009-07-29 13:11               ` Mark Brown
2009-07-29 12:59             ` Mark Brown
2009-07-29 12:37       ` Ian Molton
2009-07-29  7:31   ` Paul Mundt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A7975EB.7020903@mnementh.co.uk \
    --to=ian@mnementh.co.uk \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=damm@opensource.se \
    --cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=philipp.zabel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox