From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mingo@elte.hu, dino@in.ibm.com, johnstul@us.ibm.com,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Update woken requeued futex_q lock_ptr
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:02:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7A016C.1090002@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A7A009E.2000202@us.ibm.com>
futex_requeue() can acquire the lock on behalf of a waiter during the requeue
loop in the event of a lock steal or owner died. futex_wait_requeue_pi() cleans
up the pi_state owner, using the lock_ptr to protect against concurrent access
to the pi_state. The pi_state is found on the requeue target futex hash bucket
so the lock_ptr needs to be updated accordingly. The problem manifested by
triggering the WARN_ON in lookup_pi_state() about the pid != pi_state->owner
pid.
The astute reviewer will note that still exists a race between the time
futex_requeue() releases hb2->lock() and the time when futex_wait_requeue_pi()
acquires it. During this time the pi_state and the futex uaddr are not in sync
with the rt_mutex ownership. This patch closes the window to the point where
my tests now pass, but we still need to address it.
Note: Please apply to mainline and rt
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
CC: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
CC: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Index: 2.6.31-rc4-rt1/kernel/futex.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.31-rc4-rt1.orig/kernel/futex.c 2009-08-05 10:00:56.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.31-rc4-rt1/kernel/futex.c 2009-08-05 10:29:56.000000000 -0700
@@ -1059,19 +1059,24 @@ void requeue_futex(struct futex_q *q, st
* requeue_pi_wake_futex() - Wake a task that acquired the lock during requeue
* q: the futex_q
* key: the key of the requeue target futex
+ * hb: the hash_bucket of the requeue target futex
*
* During futex_requeue, with requeue_pi=1, it is possible to acquire the
* target futex if it is uncontended or via a lock steal. Set the futex_q key
* to the requeue target futex so the waiter can detect the wakeup on the right
* futex, but remove it from the hb and NULL the rt_waiter so it can detect
- * atomic lock acquisition. Must be called with the q->lock_ptr held.
+ * atomic lock acquisition. Set the q->lock_ptr to the requeue target hb->lock
+ * to protect access to the pi_state to fixup the owner later. Must be called
+ * with the q->lock_ptr held.
*/
static inline
-void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key)
+void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key,
+ struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
{
drop_futex_key_refs(&q->key);
get_futex_key_refs(key);
q->key = *key;
+ q->lock_ptr = &hb->lock;
WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list));
plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);
@@ -1137,7 +1142,7 @@ static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u3
ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(pifutex, hb2, key2, ps, top_waiter->task,
set_waiters);
if (ret == 1)
- requeue_pi_wake_futex(top_waiter, key2);
+ requeue_pi_wake_futex(top_waiter, key2, hb2);
return ret;
}
@@ -1323,7 +1328,7 @@ retry_private:
this->task, 1);
if (ret == 1) {
/* We got the lock. */
- requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2);
+ requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2);
continue;
} else if (ret) {
/* -EDEADLK */
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-05 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-05 21:58 [PATCH 0/2] futex: requeue_pi lock steal deadlock fixes Darren Hart
2009-08-05 22:02 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2009-08-06 5:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] Update woken requeued futex_q lock_ptr Darren Hart
2009-08-07 0:24 ` Darren Hart
2009-08-08 15:27 ` [tip:core/urgent] futex: " tip-bot for Darren Hart
2009-08-09 20:24 ` tip-bot for Darren Hart
2009-08-09 20:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-09 22:03 ` Darren Hart
2009-08-09 22:18 ` Darren Hart
2009-08-05 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/2][RT] Avoid deadlock in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7A016C.1090002@us.ibm.com \
--to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox