From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:39:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7A3445.60903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1eirqtmey.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com> writes:
>
>
>> This series of patch implements automatically reserved memory for crashkernel,
>> by introducing a new boot option "crashkernel=auto". This idea is from Neil.
>>
>> In case of breaking user-space applications, it modifies this boot option after
>> it decides how much memory should be reserved.
>>
>> On different arch, the threshold and reserved memory size is different. Please
>> refer patch 7/7 which contains an update for the documentation.
>>
>> Note: This patchset was only tested on x86_64 with differernt memory sizes.
>>
>
> This seems like a silly hard code. Especially for a feature distros don't
> care enough about to implement a working initrd for.
>
> Has anyone bothered to justify those large amounts of memory?
> Where does the 128M go?
>
If 128M is too big, we can make it to be 64M, that is no problem.
I am very open to this. :)
> Please pardon me for being a cynic but I don't see the command line option
> being the bottleneck for real users to make this work.
>
>
Well, take /me as an example, to be honest, I still have no idea how
much memory I should reserve for s390/sh, if I would use kdump on sh, it
*is* my bottleneck.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-05 11:19 [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 11:19 ` [Patch 1/7] x86: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 13:41 ` Neil Horman
2009-08-05 14:45 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-05 20:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-06 1:55 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-06 7:15 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-06 7:44 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-06 7:56 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 11:19 ` [Patch 2/7] x86: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 13:43 ` Neil Horman
2009-08-06 1:45 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 22:51 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-06 1:56 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 11:19 ` [Patch 3/7] ia64: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 13:49 ` Neil Horman
2009-08-05 11:19 ` [Patch 4/7] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 13:46 ` Neil Horman
2009-08-05 11:19 ` [Patch 5/7] powerpc: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 13:49 ` Neil Horman
2009-08-05 11:20 ` [Patch 6/7] powerpc: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 13:50 ` Neil Horman
2009-08-05 11:20 ` [Patch 7/7] doc: update the kdump document Amerigo Wang
2009-08-05 13:33 ` [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-05 14:04 ` Neil Horman
2009-08-05 22:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-06 2:05 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-06 2:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-06 3:39 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-06 3:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-06 5:57 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-06 6:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-06 6:37 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-06 8:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-06 8:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-06 9:04 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-07 19:13 ` Bernhard Walle
2009-08-06 9:11 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-07 19:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-07 21:03 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-07 21:26 ` Bernhard Walle
2009-08-07 22:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-07 21:31 ` Bernhard Walle
2009-08-07 22:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-10 3:11 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-06 1:39 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7A3445.60903@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox