From: David John <davidjon@xenontk.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Erik Mouw <mouw@nl.linux.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval)
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:59:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7ACC8D.7030706@xenontk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090806120826.GC27773@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 08/06/2009 05:38 PM, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:31:04PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>>>> Please fix your mailinglist.
>>>>>
>>>>> You claimed that it is possible to crosspost between lkml and lakml,
>>>>> yet the lakml does everything to prevent that -- even in case as
>>>>> simple as reporting that regression that affects arm.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please fix it.
>>> It is indeed possible to cross post between lkml and lakml. The easiest
>>> way to do that is to subscribe to the list and tell Mailman that you
>>> don't want to receive any messages.
>> Actually I'm subscribed, but I still have far too many problems.
>>
>> Due to the approval process, I don't think you'll ever have a spammer
>> on lakml... can the mail size + #of people in to/cc list simply be
>> increased to lkml levels?
>
> The mail size is currently 100K, having been recently increased. I
> believe this is a sane limit.
>
> The number of people is 15, which is probably a little low. I've
> already explained my personal position over that limit concerning
> requests from you. Erik's position may be different.
>
>>> When I get such a Mailman message from a list I just shrug. The
>>> moderator will take care eventually and if he rejects it I don't care.
>>> Suggest you try to do the same, there are may more important things
>>> than a message that doesn't get it to a list.
>> Well, I'd say that mailing list is pretty vital for Linux-style
>> development, and those rejects are simply far too frequent.
>
> This is the first time in at least one month that anything from you has
> been held according to the logs. If I look at my mailbox which has
> 3400+ messages from the list since 1st June, you have sent 78 messages,
> only one of which was held.
>
> I think you need to develop a realistic sense of proportion.
>
I think the basis of Pavel's complaint is that the ARM mailing list is
difficult to work with for casual users who might want to forward say,
a simple bug report.
If data protection laws prevent you from keeping an open list, can't you
host the list at kernel.org or elsewhere?
Regards,
David.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.3653.1249217530.31043.linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-08-04 10:00 ` linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval) Pavel Machek
2009-08-04 22:28 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 10:07 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 10:44 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 11:02 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 11:55 ` Russell King
2009-08-14 11:06 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 12:04 ` Erik Mouw
2009-08-14 11:07 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-04 22:39 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 10:57 ` Erik Mouw
2009-08-06 11:31 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 12:08 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 12:29 ` David John [this message]
2009-08-06 12:40 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 13:02 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-06 13:33 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 13:52 ` David John
2009-08-06 14:23 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Joe Perches
2009-08-06 15:03 ` Ben Dooks
2009-08-06 15:14 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-06 15:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-06 16:18 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-06 16:40 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 16:53 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-08 10:55 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-10 23:49 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-11 10:33 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-08-12 11:55 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-12 19:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-12 20:17 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-12 21:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-12 22:00 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-12 22:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-12 22:04 ` David Miller
2009-08-13 1:18 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 7:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 8:59 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-14 0:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-14 5:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-08-13 9:35 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-13 9:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 9:54 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-13 9:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 10:12 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-13 10:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-13 10:16 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 10:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 11:01 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Change ARM "subscriber-only" lists to "moderated for non-subscribers" Joe Perches
2009-08-13 13:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 11:08 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Joe Perches
2009-08-13 11:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 12:16 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 13:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 13:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-13 21:07 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-14 7:59 ` Daniel Mack
2009-08-14 9:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-14 10:01 ` Daniel Silverstone
2009-08-14 16:39 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARMsections H Hartley Sweeten
2009-08-14 10:01 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Catalin Marinas
2009-08-14 15:47 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-08-14 11:25 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-14 11:18 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-14 11:16 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-14 19:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-14 20:43 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-12 22:01 ` David Miller
2009-08-12 23:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-12 23:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 0:48 ` Marek Vasut
2009-08-08 10:45 ` linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval) Pavel Machek
2009-08-08 10:42 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 13:17 ` David John
2009-08-06 12:15 ` Erik Mouw
2009-08-08 10:40 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7ACC8D.7030706@xenontk.org \
--to=davidjon@xenontk.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mouw@nl.linux.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox