From: David John <davidjon@xenontk.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Erik Mouw <mouw@nl.linux.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval)
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:22:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7AE005.8000205@xenontk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090806133349.GF27773@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 08/06/2009 07:03 PM, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:02:10AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 13:40 +0100, Russell King wrote:
>>> And no, moving the list outside the EU domain doesn't relieve any
>>> of the lawful issues unless (as I understand the law) someone outside
>>> the EU were to run the list. And people would have to independently
>>> subscribe to it - I wouldn't be able to export the existing subscriber
>>> list outside the EU.
>> I suspect a vger based ARM list would not require you to "run" it.
>>
>> Perhaps you overestimate the value of the arm subscriber database
>> as well as the work involved to subscribe to a list.
>>
>> Adding a "click this to subscribe to the new list" to the mailing
>> list trailer would work reasonably well.
>
> There is already a vger based ARM list. I see no signs of people
> moving over to it. I summise that is because most people don't
> have a problem, and most people are happy with the existing lists
> as they stand. Could it be that it's only a minority who are
> having issues. I don't know.
>
> I also believe that majordomo is still stuck in the dark ages wrt
> subscribing - having to have a carefully composed email message to
> subscribe or unsubscribe. Having mailman's web interface took a
> lot of work off of my shoulders when we moved the ARM lists off
> of vger.rutgers.edu all those years back having to educate people
> how to deal with majordomo.
That may be true, but the key point here is that the majordomo list is open.
Which means that say if I am an admin and I happen to notice a bug, I can send
an email to lkml knowing that someone more knowledgeable will be able to pick it up.
If on the other hand I have to subscribe to the list and then my mail has to be
moderator approved (which might take a few days considering the moderator's
workload), I'm more likely to just let it slip and hope that it gets fixed in
the next release...
>
> Let's not forget - as Pavel has yet again proven - if you have a
> problem with a mailing list, who do you talk to. All the list
> admins? Of course not! You email rmk and/or mailing lists
> directly.
>
>>> Now, people here can tell me I'm wrong, but they aren't in the legal
>>> profession... Would you get a gardener to fix your gas boiler, or
>>> would you get a qualified and registered gas engineer in?
>> Perhaps not using the gas boiler is another option.
>
> Maybe we should all go back to using coal fires then. Oops, we moved
> away from that to cleaner burning gas because of the smog problems
> caused by burning dirty fuels.
>
Regards,
David.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.3653.1249217530.31043.linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-08-04 10:00 ` linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval) Pavel Machek
2009-08-04 22:28 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 10:07 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 10:44 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 11:02 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 11:55 ` Russell King
2009-08-14 11:06 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 12:04 ` Erik Mouw
2009-08-14 11:07 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-04 22:39 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 10:57 ` Erik Mouw
2009-08-06 11:31 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 12:08 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 12:29 ` David John
2009-08-06 12:40 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 13:02 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-06 13:33 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 13:52 ` David John [this message]
2009-08-06 14:23 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Joe Perches
2009-08-06 15:03 ` Ben Dooks
2009-08-06 15:14 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-06 15:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-06 16:18 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-06 16:40 ` Russell King
2009-08-06 16:53 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-08 10:55 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-10 23:49 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-11 10:33 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-08-12 11:55 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-12 19:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-12 20:17 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-12 21:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-12 22:00 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-12 22:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-12 22:04 ` David Miller
2009-08-13 1:18 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 7:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 8:59 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-14 0:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-14 5:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-08-13 9:35 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-13 9:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 9:54 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-13 9:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 10:12 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-13 10:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-13 10:16 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 10:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 11:01 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Change ARM "subscriber-only" lists to "moderated for non-subscribers" Joe Perches
2009-08-13 13:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 11:08 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Joe Perches
2009-08-13 11:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 12:16 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 13:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 13:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-13 21:07 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-14 7:59 ` Daniel Mack
2009-08-14 9:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-14 10:01 ` Daniel Silverstone
2009-08-14 16:39 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARMsections H Hartley Sweeten
2009-08-14 10:01 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Catalin Marinas
2009-08-14 15:47 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-08-14 11:25 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-14 11:18 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-14 11:16 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-14 19:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-14 20:43 ` Joe Perches
2009-08-12 22:01 ` David Miller
2009-08-12 23:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-12 23:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-08-13 0:48 ` Marek Vasut
2009-08-08 10:45 ` linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval) Pavel Machek
2009-08-08 10:42 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 13:17 ` David John
2009-08-06 12:15 ` Erik Mouw
2009-08-08 10:40 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7AE005.8000205@xenontk.org \
--to=davidjon@xenontk.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mouw@nl.linux.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox