Re: [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto

Amerigo Wang
2009-08-06T09:04:51Z

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Hmm. I half take it back. How is crashkernel=auto and then shrinking
> the reserved size better than the extended syntax Bernhard Walle
> introduced nearly two years ago?
>

You mean something like crashkernel=512M-2G:64M,2G-:128M?
Isn't it longer and more complex than "crashkernel=auto" for an end user?

Hmm, this makes me to think that "crashkernel=auto" can be a replacement
for that extended syntax...