From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756446AbZHGVcP (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:32:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753786AbZHGVcO (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:32:14 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:32781 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753529AbZHGVcN (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:32:13 -0400 X-Authenticated: #2360897 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+aZp8C6/maqt47FIuuQYqkeH389iuBRMGo81U/Hc 0UgPu1ORnrgzuY Message-ID: <4A7C9D48.3030405@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:31:52 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: Amerigo Wang , Neil Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , Anton Vorontsov , Andi Kleen , Kexec Mailing List Subject: Re: [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto References: <20090805112123.6552.73574.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090805140408.GJ7259@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <4A7A3A78.7080200@redhat.com> <4A7A506B.2060008@redhat.com> <4A7A70E5.2010204@redhat.com> <4A7A7A0F.6070906@redhat.com> <4A7A9E54.60705@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.63 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman schrieb: > > With the current set of crashkernel= options we are asking the > distribution installer to perform magic. Moving as much of this logic > into a normal init script for better maintenance is desirable. Not (necessarily) the installer but the program that configures kdump. system-config-kdump on Red Hat, YaST on SUSE. > Bernhard does that sound useful to you? I don't see any problems. I don't know how much effort is it to free already reserved crashkernel memory, but I guess it's not really complicated. Maybe that "1/32" should be specified on the command line like crashkernel=>>5 (for 1/32*system_memory == system_memory>>5), OTOH I have no real strong opinion. Regards, Bernhard