Re: Page allocation failures in guest

Pierre Ossman
2009-08-12T08:22:39Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 725 bytes --]

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:43:46 +0300
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 08/12/2009 09:19 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > Will it still trigger the OOM killer with this patch, or will things
> > behave slightly more gracefully?
> >
>
> I don't think you mentioned the OOM killer in your original report? Did
> it trigger?
>

I might have things backwards here, but I though the OOM killer started
doing its dirty business once you got that memory allocation failure
dump.

Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman

WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]