From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v2 2/2] Initialize mempool and elevator only for request-based dm devices
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:06:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A812680.7040804@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908101618.21060.knikanth@suse.de>
Hi Nikanth,
On 08/10/2009 07:48 PM +0900, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> Intialize the request_queue and elevator only when the device is marked as
> a request-based device. This avoids unnecessary creation of mempool for
> requests. Also we wrongly initialize the elevator even for bio-based devices.
> As the /sys/block/dm-*/queue/scheduler is exported for device-mapper devices,
> it is possible to confuse with scheduler options for bio-based devices where
> scheduler is not at all used.
Thank you for working on this.
Actually, I had tried this delayed allocation thing before,
but I chose the current implementation since I couldn't solve
some problems, which your patch also has.
Please see my comment below.
> @@ -2203,6 +2199,25 @@ int dm_swap_table(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *table)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /* new device is being marked as request-based */
> + if (!md->map && dm_table_request_based(table)) {
> + /* initialize queue for request-based dm */
> + r = blk_init_allocated_queue(md->queue, dm_request_fn, NULL);
> + if (r)
> + goto out;
Generally, dm must not allocate memory during resume because
it may cause a deadlock in no memory situation.
However, there is no I/O on this device at this point,
so the allocation should be ok for this special case.
I think some comments are needed here to describe that.
> +
> + /*
> + * reinitialize make_request_fn as it was reset to the
> + * default __make_request by blk_init_allocate_queue
> + */
> + md->saved_make_request_fn = md->queue->make_request_fn;
> + blk_queue_make_request(md->queue, dm_request);
> +
> + blk_queue_softirq_done(md->queue, dm_softirq_done);
> + blk_queue_prep_rq(md->queue, dm_prep_fn);
> + blk_queue_lld_busy(md->queue, dm_lld_busy);
> + }
> +
> __unbind(md);
> r = __bind(md, table, &limits);
The queue has been registered at the device creation time by
add_disk() in alloc_dev().
Since the queue is reconfigured (elevator is attached), you have to
update the queue registration (e.g. unregister, then re-register).
But it may not be easy. At least, there is no exported interface to
unregister/re-register queue.
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-11 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-08 4:56 [PATCH 2/2] Initialize mempool and elevator only for request-based dm devices Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-08 16:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-10 10:21 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-10 10:48 ` [PATCH-v2 " Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11 8:06 ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2009-08-11 9:05 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11 9:32 ` [PATCH-v3 " Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-12 2:15 ` [PATCH-v2 " Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-08-12 8:47 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-14 7:01 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-11 16:23 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A812680.7040804@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox