From: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@redhat.com>
To: Olaf Dabrunz <Olaf.Dabrunz@gmx.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: drivers/pci/quirks.c: irq_reroute_variant is dead code?
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:48:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8176CA.5040501@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090811123605.GD14714@santana.dyndns.org>
On 11.08.2009 14:36, Olaf Dabrunz wrote:
> On 11-Aug-09, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Stefan Assmann<sassmann@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10.08.2009 18:32, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>>> [Corrected Stefan's address.]
>>> Thanks Jesse! CCing Olaf as well.
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 16:45:20 +0200
>>>> Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> * Jesse Barnes<jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:50:08 -0700
>>>>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge<jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> quirk_reroute_to_boot_interrupts_intel() goes to some effort to
>>>>>>> scan for a bunch of Intel devices and set
>>>>>>> dev->irq_reroute_variant = INTEL_IRQ_REROUTE_VARIANT. However,
>>>>>>> as far as I can see that's the only reference to
>>>>>>> dev->irq_reroute_variant and INTEL_IRQ_REROUTE_VARIANT, so the
>>>>>>> whole thing appears to have no effect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it all dead code? Is there something else which should be
>>>>>>> there missing?
>>>>>> Hm my quick look couldn't find a user either. The initial patch
>>>>>> to add that stuff (e1d3a90846b40ad3160bf4b648d36c6badad39ac) had
>>>>>> an ACPI component, but it looks like that may have vanished
>>>>>> somehow (maybe some of the IOAPIC code got shuffled around and
>>>>>> this bit was missed?).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stefan or Ingo?
>>>>> I dont remember ioapic interactions. Stefan?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ingo
>>>>>
>>> Actually the ACPI part of the commit got trashed by some major
>>> ACPI rewrite. [...]
>> Yeah, i remember some larger reject resolved by Len i think, about
>> two cycles ago, in this area. So we probably lost those bits there -
>> i've Cc:-ed Len.
>>
>> There's no urgency in terms of v2.6.31 (since we never really
>> exposed this new functionality in a new release), but it would be
>> nice to get to the bottom of this.
>
> Yep, that would be nice.
>
> I was made aware of that problem early this year when the ACPI code
> change was made. Since then I heard that someone already wrote some
> patch for the boot IRQ quirks. But obviously that referred to some other
> part of the quirk. Stefan?
That's a whole different story (other chipset). ;-)
> As I am currently unemployed, demotivated and trying to get my work on
> fctrace going again (as well as to get the rest of my life in order),
> it seems I have no time to fix this. I would love to, really. We need to
> get these quirks in, and I would like to discuss how to do this The Right
> Way with the rewritten ACPI code (and the existing MP code).
Well, best of luck!
Stefan
--
Stefan Assmann | Red Hat GmbH
Software Engineer | Otto-Hahn-Strasse 20, 85609 Dornach
| HR: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243
| GF: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters,
sassmann at redhat.com | Michael Cunningham, Charles Cachera
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-11 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-28 19:50 drivers/pci/quirks.c: irq_reroute_variant is dead code? Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-08-07 17:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-08-08 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 16:32 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-08-11 7:47 ` Stefan Assmann
2009-08-11 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-11 12:36 ` Olaf Dabrunz
2009-08-11 13:48 ` Stefan Assmann [this message]
2009-09-07 16:09 ` Stefan Assmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A8176CA.5040501@redhat.com \
--to=sassmann@redhat.com \
--cc=Olaf.Dabrunz@gmx.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox