From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750940AbZHLX7c (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:59:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750754AbZHLX7c (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:59:32 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:33169 "EHLO mail-yx0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbZHLX7b (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:59:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=w5O7ZIx0RJKYc3EKd0AxykqJ/DPfOxyzvDgO758a0mEjUijD4y1rdIIZK1S0HVXgbu BRi/lqdKwMtkx/np9qu1jCoRtjAPIpm4U9U9LEJe8XL40LoFwjTZ2mzeUZ9GfzHvrJbT Kx6QwBtsK4hfyVMW+gkZuWfH4HSYpsn4ZqKIA= Message-ID: <4A835760.2050803@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:59:28 -0600 From: Robert Hancock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Flooded by do_IRQ: 0.91 No irq handler for vector References: <4A80C2F8.2040208@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/11/2009 04:28 PM, Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez wrote: > I'm really concerned that all those interrupts might slow down the > computer somehow... > Here is an attached syslog part after a reboot. > Sometimes, the ratelimit says that thousands of callbacks were suppressed. > Is there a way to make this message be displayed only once? > > In arch/x86/kernel/irq.c, the line 213 is: > irq = __get_cpu_var(vector_irq)[vector]; > > In my case, the returned irq is -1. Doesn't it makes sense to not log > the "No irq handler for vector" message when irq< 0? > > Or even a deeper answer: Why, in my case, the resulting irq is -1? Not logging would just cover up the problem, the issue in your case is that something seems to be asserting a ton of interrupts on an IRQ line that no driver has claimed.. > > > > 2009/8/10 Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez: >> I've just compiled 2.6.30.4, and it shows another info: >> do_IRQ: 0.91 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) >> >> Attached are the /proc/interrupts and the lspci -vv >> >> Anyway, sorry for not specifying my hardware: >> * Intel Core2 Duo 2.13 GHz >> * 2GB RAM >> * NVidia 7900 GS >> >> Thanks. >>