From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754630AbZHMNqw (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:46:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754570AbZHMNqv (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:46:51 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:10793 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754553AbZHMNqt (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:46:49 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,374,1246863600"; d="scan'208";a="438672265" Message-ID: <4A84194A.5050206@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:46:50 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Schwebel CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: state of the fastboot activities? References: <20090813064543.GC13320@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20090813064543.GC13320@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert Schwebel wrote: > Hi Arjan, > > Can you elaborate on the current state of the fastboot activities? This > tree here: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/arjan/linux-2.6-async-for-30.git;a=summary > > came to a stop in march, and the mainline contains the asyncronous init > stuff, but no "fastboot" parameter as described on LWN: > > http://lwn.net/Articles/314808/ > there is no more option; the behavior is there by default.... so it's all integrated and done..