From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754763AbZHMP20 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:28:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752175AbZHMP20 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:28:26 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:45092 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751318AbZHMP2Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:28:25 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,375,1246863600"; d="scan'208";a="438697295" Message-ID: <4A84311A.3030901@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:28:26 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Schwebel CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: state of the fastboot activities? References: <20090813064543.GC13320@pengutronix.de> <4A84194A.5050206@linux.intel.com> <20090813152506.GQ13320@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20090813152506.GQ13320@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 06:46:50AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> there is no more option; the behavior is there by default.... so it's >> all integrated and done.. > > That's bad :-) So there is no room for improvement any more in our ARM > boot sequences ... > > Thanks, > rsc on x86 we're doing pretty well ;-)