From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753919AbZHNE0p (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:26:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751053AbZHNE0o (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:26:44 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:33275 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750962AbZHNE0n (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:26:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4A84E766.3070904@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:26:14 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible cpu map handling References: <20090806115705.GB10734@elte.hu> <4A7B01B8.8000902@kernel.org> <4A825CD5.3060209@kernel.org> <20090812.162517.13032565.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20090812.162517.13032565.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Tejun Heo > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:10:29 +0900 > >> Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>>> for the x86 bits: >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar >>>> >>>> Once Dave acks it i suspect you can send it to Linus directly? >> Aieeeee, no response. > > These patches look fine, and I've tested them also on my > Niagara-2 box. > > Acked-by: David S. Miller > > Sorry for the delay :) Great. Oops, last review pass revealed a bug in the following chunk. @@ -1259,9 +1259,16 @@ ssize_t __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t static_size, size_t reserved_size, } /* return the leftover and copy */ - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) { void *ptr = pcpue_ptr + cpu * pcpue_unit_size; + if (cpu_possible(cpu)) { + free_bootmem(__pa(ptr + pcpue_size), + pcpue_unit_size - pcpue_size); + memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_load, static_size); + } else + free_bootmem(__pa(ptr), pcpue_unit_size); + free_bootmem(__pa(ptr + pcpue_size), pcpue_unit_size - pcpue_size); memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_load, static_size); The if-else block should replace the original free_bootmem()/memcpy() not added in front of it. Fixed. Will reply with updated patch. Thanks. -- tejun