linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	jens.axboe@oracle.com, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
	balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
	nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
	mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it,
	fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, agk@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, jmarchan@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IO-Controller: clear ioq wait flag if a request goes into that ioq
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:57:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8DF0F7.6070100@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090820134221.GC10615@redhat.com>

Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:46:10AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
>> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> ...
>>>  		/*
>>>  		 * Remember that we saw a request from this process, but
>>> @@ -1940,7 +2013,7 @@ void elv_ioq_request_add(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>>>  		 * has other work pending, don't risk delaying until the
>>>  		 * idle timer unplug to continue working.
>>>  		 */
>>> -		if (elv_ioq_wait_request(ioq)) {
>>> +		if (group_wait || elv_ioq_wait_request(ioq)) {
>> Hi Vivek,
>>
>> I guess we need to clear ioq_wait_request flags if there are requests to 
>> go in this ioq. Otherwise, once waitting request on ioq, it will go into
>> this path every time when a request is enqueued.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Hi Gui,
> 
> It does sound like that we need to clear ioq wait_request flag here. In
> fact upstream CFQ code is also not clearing this flag. Looking at the
> code, can't think why it should not be cleared here.
> 
> Can you please also generate a patch for CFQ and post to lkml.
> 

Sure, will do.

-- 
Regards
Gui Jianfeng


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-21  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-16 19:30 [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V8 Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 01/24] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-08-25  3:36   ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 02/24] io-controller: Core of the elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-08-17  5:29   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-17 20:37     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-19 16:01   ` Jerome Marchand
2009-08-19 18:41     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-20 14:51       ` Jerome Marchand
2009-08-20 15:04         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-19 18:30   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-21  1:54   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-21  2:00     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-27  2:49   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-27 21:08     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 03/24] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-08-19  3:36   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-19 18:39     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 04/24] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 05/24] io-controller: Core scheduler changes to support hierarhical scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 06/24] io-controller: cgroup related changes for hierarchical group support Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 07/24] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 08/24] io-controller: cfq changes to use " Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 09/24] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 10/24] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 11/24] io-controller: Introduce group idling Vivek Goyal
2009-08-20  1:46   ` [PATCH] IO-Controller: clear ioq wait flag if a request goes into that ioq Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-20 13:42     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-21  0:57       ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2009-08-28  1:12   ` [PATCH 11/24] io-controller: Introduce group idling Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 12/24] io-controller: Wait for requests to complete from last queue before new queue is scheduled Vivek Goyal
2009-08-24  3:30   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 13/24] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 14/24] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 15/24] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 16/24] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 17/24] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 18/24] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-08-18 11:42   ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-08-18 14:26     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-19  1:43       ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 19/24] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 20/24] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 21/24] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 22/24] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 23/24] io-controller: map sync requests to group using bio tracking info Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 24/24] io-controller: debug elevator fair queuing support Vivek Goyal
2009-08-16 19:53 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V8 Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A8DF0F7.6070100@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpshah@google.com \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).