* haptics devices linux driver support @ 2009-08-22 17:04 Trilok Soni 2009-08-22 17:21 ` Jiri Slaby 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Trilok Soni @ 2009-08-22 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: LKML; +Cc: linux-input Hi, Does anyone know example Linux drivers for haptics devices? -- ---Trilok Soni http://triloksoni.wordpress.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: haptics devices linux driver support 2009-08-22 17:04 haptics devices linux driver support Trilok Soni @ 2009-08-22 17:21 ` Jiri Slaby 2009-08-23 4:45 ` Kyungmin Park 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jiri Slaby @ 2009-08-22 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trilok Soni; +Cc: LKML, linux-input On 08/22/2009 07:04 PM, Trilok Soni wrote: > Does anyone know example Linux drivers for haptics devices? Yup, drivers/misc/phantom.c for Sensable Phantom (the old one over PCI). The rest needed (esp. floating point computation) is done in userspace. Then, all force-feedack drivers under drivers/input and drivers/hid. What exactly do you want to know? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: haptics devices linux driver support 2009-08-22 17:21 ` Jiri Slaby @ 2009-08-23 4:45 ` Kyungmin Park 2009-08-23 7:51 ` Trilok Soni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kyungmin Park @ 2009-08-23 4:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Slaby; +Cc: Trilok Soni, LKML, linux-input Hi, There's three types as I know, 1) just GPIO enable motor 2) GPIO & PWM motor. 3) I2C based GPIO & PWM motor. Frankly we made a motor framework at kernel. but I 'm not sure motor is right naming or not. I think we need new framework. since it's not input device. Thank you, Kyungmin Park On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Jiri Slaby<jirislaby@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/22/2009 07:04 PM, Trilok Soni wrote: >> Does anyone know example Linux drivers for haptics devices? > > Yup, drivers/misc/phantom.c for Sensable Phantom (the old one over PCI). > The rest needed (esp. floating point computation) is done in userspace. > > Then, all force-feedack drivers under drivers/input and drivers/hid. > > What exactly do you want to know? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: haptics devices linux driver support 2009-08-23 4:45 ` Kyungmin Park @ 2009-08-23 7:51 ` Trilok Soni 2009-08-24 16:36 ` Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar 2009-09-07 11:29 ` Trilok Soni 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Trilok Soni @ 2009-08-23 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyungmin Park; +Cc: Jiri Slaby, LKML, linux-input Hi Kyungmin, On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Kyungmin Park<kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: > Hi, > > There's three types as I know, > > 1) just GPIO enable motor > 2) GPIO & PWM motor. > 3) I2C based GPIO & PWM motor. > > Frankly we made a motor framework at kernel. but I 'm not sure motor > is right naming or not. > I think we need new framework. since it's not input device. I am looking at 3rd type, and evaulating that for embedded systems devices having haptics chips can be programmed under drivers/input or not. It is kind of early discussion and gathering inputs on what could be lacking part in input subsystem for support such category of devices. Is it possible for you to submit your version of code and drivers? It will be good starting point for discussion. -- ---Trilok Soni http://triloksoni.wordpress.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: haptics devices linux driver support 2009-08-23 7:51 ` Trilok Soni @ 2009-08-24 16:36 ` Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar 2009-09-07 11:29 ` Trilok Soni 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar @ 2009-08-24 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trilok Soni; +Cc: Kyungmin Park, Jiri Slaby, LKML, linux-input Hi, I am interested to know real examples of haptic devices you speak about. It would be nice if you send some links or pics. I remember there was the same problem categorizing other input devices like accelerometers. Thanks On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Trilok Soni<soni.trilok@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kyungmin, > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Kyungmin Park<kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There's three types as I know, >> >> 1) just GPIO enable motor >> 2) GPIO & PWM motor. >> 3) I2C based GPIO & PWM motor. >> >> Frankly we made a motor framework at kernel. but I 'm not sure motor >> is right naming or not. >> I think we need new framework. since it's not input device. > > I am looking at 3rd type, and evaulating that for embedded systems > devices having haptics chips can be programmed under drivers/input or > not. It is kind of early discussion and gathering inputs on what could > be lacking part in input subsystem for support such category of > devices. > > Is it possible for you to submit your version of code and drivers? It > will be good starting point for discussion. > > > -- > ---Trilok Soni > http://triloksoni.wordpress.com > http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: haptics devices linux driver support 2009-08-23 7:51 ` Trilok Soni 2009-08-24 16:36 ` Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar @ 2009-09-07 11:29 ` Trilok Soni 2009-09-07 11:44 ` Joonyoung Shim 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Trilok Soni @ 2009-09-07 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyungmin Park; +Cc: Jiri Slaby, LKML, linux-input Hi Kyungmin, On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Trilok Soni<soni.trilok@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kyungmin, > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Kyungmin Park<kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There's three types as I know, >> >> 1) just GPIO enable motor >> 2) GPIO & PWM motor. >> 3) I2C based GPIO & PWM motor. >> >> Frankly we made a motor framework at kernel. but I 'm not sure motor >> is right naming or not. >> I think we need new framework. since it's not input device. > > I am looking at 3rd type, and evaulating that for embedded systems > devices having haptics chips can be programmed under drivers/input or > not. It is kind of early discussion and gathering inputs on what could > be lacking part in input subsystem for support such category of > devices. > > Is it possible for you to submit your version of code and drivers? It > will be good starting point for discussion. Any updates on my request ? ---Trilok Soni ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: haptics devices linux driver support 2009-09-07 11:29 ` Trilok Soni @ 2009-09-07 11:44 ` Joonyoung Shim 2009-09-07 12:26 ` Trilok Soni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Joonyoung Shim @ 2009-09-07 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trilok Soni; +Cc: Kyungmin Park, Jiri Slaby, LKML, linux-input On 9/7/2009 8:29 PM, Trilok Soni wrote: > Hi Kyungmin, > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Trilok Soni<soni.trilok@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Kyungmin, >> >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Kyungmin Park<kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> There's three types as I know, >>> >>> 1) just GPIO enable motor >>> 2) GPIO & PWM motor. >>> 3) I2C based GPIO & PWM motor. >>> >>> Frankly we made a motor framework at kernel. but I 'm not sure motor >>> is right naming or not. >>> I think we need new framework. since it's not input device. >> I am looking at 3rd type, and evaulating that for embedded systems >> devices having haptics chips can be programmed under drivers/input or >> not. It is kind of early discussion and gathering inputs on what could >> be lacking part in input subsystem for support such category of >> devices. >> >> Is it possible for you to submit your version of code and drivers? It >> will be good starting point for discussion. > > Any updates on my request ? > Hi, I will post the haptic framework soon(maybe tomorrow) instead of Kyungmin because he leaves a office for days. > ---Trilok Soni > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: haptics devices linux driver support 2009-09-07 11:44 ` Joonyoung Shim @ 2009-09-07 12:26 ` Trilok Soni 2009-09-07 13:06 ` Kyungmin Park 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Trilok Soni @ 2009-09-07 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joonyoung Shim; +Cc: Kyungmin Park, Jiri Slaby, LKML, linux-input Hi Joonyoung Shim, On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim<jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote: > On 9/7/2009 8:29 PM, Trilok Soni wrote: >> Hi Kyungmin, >> >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Trilok Soni<soni.trilok@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Kyungmin, >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Kyungmin Park<kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> There's three types as I know, >>>> >>>> 1) just GPIO enable motor >>>> 2) GPIO & PWM motor. >>>> 3) I2C based GPIO & PWM motor. >>>> >>>> Frankly we made a motor framework at kernel. but I 'm not sure motor >>>> is right naming or not. >>>> I think we need new framework. since it's not input device. >>> I am looking at 3rd type, and evaulating that for embedded systems >>> devices having haptics chips can be programmed under drivers/input or >>> not. It is kind of early discussion and gathering inputs on what could >>> be lacking part in input subsystem for support such category of >>> devices. >>> >>> Is it possible for you to submit your version of code and drivers? It >>> will be good starting point for discussion. >> >> Any updates on my request ? >> > > Hi, I will post the haptic framework soon(maybe tomorrow) instead of > Kyungmin because he leaves a office for days. Excellent. I just came back from vacation :) -- ---Trilok Soni http://triloksoni.wordpress.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: haptics devices linux driver support 2009-09-07 12:26 ` Trilok Soni @ 2009-09-07 13:06 ` Kyungmin Park 2009-09-11 18:52 ` Pavel Machek 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kyungmin Park @ 2009-09-07 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trilok Soni; +Cc: Joonyoung Shim, Jiri Slaby, LKML, linux-input On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Trilok Soni<soni.trilok@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Joonyoung Shim, > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim<jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote: >> On 9/7/2009 8:29 PM, Trilok Soni wrote: >>> Hi Kyungmin, >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Trilok Soni<soni.trilok@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Kyungmin, >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Kyungmin Park<kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> There's three types as I know, >>>>> >>>>> 1) just GPIO enable motor >>>>> 2) GPIO & PWM motor. >>>>> 3) I2C based GPIO & PWM motor. >>>>> >>>>> Frankly we made a motor framework at kernel. but I 'm not sure motor >>>>> is right naming or not. >>>>> I think we need new framework. since it's not input device. >>>> I am looking at 3rd type, and evaulating that for embedded systems >>>> devices having haptics chips can be programmed under drivers/input or >>>> not. It is kind of early discussion and gathering inputs on what could >>>> be lacking part in input subsystem for support such category of >>>> devices. >>>> >>>> Is it possible for you to submit your version of code and drivers? It >>>> will be good starting point for discussion. >>> >>> Any updates on my request ? >>> >> >> Hi, I will post the haptic framework soon(maybe tomorrow) instead of >> Kyungmin because he leaves a office for days. > > Excellent. I just came back from vacation :) > FYI: I already finished the i2c based pwm & gpio devices. but I'm not sure can release it at this time since we need to review it internally. Do you hear any patent issue? Since just one vendor (V company) has almost patents related with vibrators. Please find out the these. Thank you, Kyungmin Park ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: haptics devices linux driver support 2009-09-07 13:06 ` Kyungmin Park @ 2009-09-11 18:52 ` Pavel Machek 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Pavel Machek @ 2009-09-11 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyungmin Park; +Cc: Trilok Soni, Joonyoung Shim, Jiri Slaby, LKML, linux-input > >> Hi, I will post the haptic framework soon(maybe tomorrow) instead of > >> Kyungmin because he leaves a office for days. > > > > Excellent. I just came back from vacation :) > > > > FYI: I already finished the i2c based pwm & gpio devices. but I'm not > sure can release it at this time since we need to review it > internally. > > Do you hear any patent issue? Since just one vendor (V company) has > almost patents related with vibrators. > Please find out the these. Please keep patent talk off lkml. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-13 10:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-08-22 17:04 haptics devices linux driver support Trilok Soni 2009-08-22 17:21 ` Jiri Slaby 2009-08-23 4:45 ` Kyungmin Park 2009-08-23 7:51 ` Trilok Soni 2009-08-24 16:36 ` Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar 2009-09-07 11:29 ` Trilok Soni 2009-09-07 11:44 ` Joonyoung Shim 2009-09-07 12:26 ` Trilok Soni 2009-09-07 13:06 ` Kyungmin Park 2009-09-11 18:52 ` Pavel Machek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox