From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix system die when load with "reservetop" parameter
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:21:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A91EB08.6030009@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090821133553.GE10263@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> The system will die if the kernel is booted with "reservetop"
>> parameter, in present code, parse "reservetop" parameter after
>> early_ioremap_init(), and some function still use early_ioremap()
>> after it.
>
> btw., what are you using the 'reservetop' boot option for?
>
Hi Ingo,
Actually, this bug is detected by my review first, then confirm it by
loading with "reservetop" parameter
>> The problem is, "reservetop" parameter can modify 'FIXADDR_TOP',
>> then the virtual address got by early_ioremap() is base on old
>> 'FIXADDR_TOP', but the page mapping is base on new 'FIXADDR_TOP',
>> it will occur page fault, and the IDT is not prepare yet, so, the
>> system is dead.
>>
>> So, put parse_early_param() in the front of early_ioremap_init()
>> in this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Does this bug trigger in 2.6.30 too?
>
> I'm quite nervous about doing this change so late in the .31 cycle,
> we've got a hundred early parameters that now get executed much
> earlier than before. No way can i test all of them and others
> testing it (like in your case) takes time to trickle through.
>
> So unless this is a .31 regression i'd be inclined to queue it up
> for .32.
>
OK, this parameter is introduced in v2.6.27, but It seems like less
people use it and no one report this bug before. So, I think we can
queue it up for .32
Thanks,
Xiao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-24 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 12:23 [PATCH] x86: fix system die when load with "reservetop" parameter Xiao Guangrong
2009-08-21 13:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-24 1:21 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2009-08-21 14:43 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix system crash when loading " tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A91EB08.6030009@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox