From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, andi@firstfloor.org, mingo@elte.hu,
bernhard.walle@gmx.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
Subject: Re: [Patch 5/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:59:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A91F401.3010904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090821172407.d3a5cd2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:55:04 -0400
> Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE
>> +#define ARCH_HAS_DEFAULT_CRASH_SIZE
>> +static inline
>> +unsigned long long arch_default_crash_size(unsigned long long total_size)
>> +{
>> + if (total_size >= 4ULL<<30 && total_size < 12ULL<<30)
>> + return 1ULL<<28;
>> + else if (total_size >= 12ULL<<30 && total_size < 128ULL<<30)
>> + return 1ULL<<29;
>> + else if (total_size >= 128ULL<<30 && total_size < 256ULL<<30)
>> + return 3ULL<<28;
>> + else if (total_size >= 256ULL<<30 && total_size < 378ULL<<30)
>> + return 1ULL<<30;
>> + else if (total_size >= 318ULL<<30 && total_size < 512ULL<<30)
>> + return 3ULL<<29;
>> + else if (total_size >= 512ULL<<30 && total_size < 768ULL<<30)
>> + return 2ULL<<30;
>> + else if (total_size >= 768ULL<<30)
>> + return 3ULL<<30;
>> +}
>> +#include <asm-generic/kexec.h>
>> +#endif
>>
>
> a) Why on earth is this inlined?
>
> b) Please consider making arch_default_crash_size() a __weak
> function. You'll probably find the result to be pleasing.
>
Good idea!
> c) If we can't use __weak then please don't add
> ARCH_HAS_DEFAULT_CRASH_SIZE. Instead do this trick:
>
>
> #ifndef arch_default_crash_size
> static inline unsigned long long arch_default_crash_size(unsigned long long total_size)
> {
> ...
> }
> #define arch_default_crash_size arch_default_crash_size
> #endif
>
> because i) it's good to standardise on something and ii) one less
> symbol gets added to the kernel.
>
Yes, agree. I will try b) which seems to be better than c).
> d) why is asm-generic/kexec.h only included in asm/kexec.h if
> CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE happened to be defined? That makes no
> sense - there may be a multitude of reasons why asm/kexec.h wants
> to include asm-generic/kexec.h.
>
>
Hmm, yes? kernel/kexec.c includes linux/kexec.h which already includes
asm/kexec.h....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-24 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-21 6:54 [Patch 0/8] V4 Implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:54 ` [Patch 1/8] kexec: allow to shrink reserved memory Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22 0:17 ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-24 1:36 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22 1:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-24 2:02 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:54 ` [Patch 2/8] x86: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:54 ` [Patch 3/8] x86: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:54 ` [Patch 4/8] ia64: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:55 ` [Patch 5/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-22 11:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-24 2:05 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-24 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-24 8:21 ` Bernhard Walle
2009-08-24 10:23 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-24 1:59 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
2009-08-21 6:55 ` [Patch 6/8] powerpc: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-24 13:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-24 14:45 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-25 6:37 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-25 10:24 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-25 6:23 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-25 10:28 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-26 6:59 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:55 ` [Patch 7/8] powerpc: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:55 ` [Patch 8/8] doc: update the kdump document Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22 0:06 ` [Patch 0/8] V4 Implement crashkernel=auto Andrew Morton
2009-08-24 1:34 ` Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A91F401.3010904@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=bernhard.walle@gmx.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox