From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: mohan@in.ibm.com
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, bernhard.walle@gmx.de,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 6/8] powerpc: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:37:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A938698.40302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090824144542.GB11956@in.ibm.com>
M. Mohan Kumar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:44:03PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 02:55 -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>
>>> Introduce a new config option KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE for powerpc.
>>>
>>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>>> @@ -346,6 +346,17 @@ config KEXEC
>>> support. As of this writing the exact hardware interface is
>>> strongly in flux, so no good recommendation can be made.
>>>
>>> +config KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE
>>> + bool "automatically reserve memory for kexec kernel"
>>> + depends on KEXEC
>>> + default y
>>> + ---help---
>>> + Automatically reserve memory for a kexec kernel, so that you don't
>>> + need to specify numbers for the "crashkernel=X@Y" boot option,
>>> + instead you can use "crashkernel=auto". To make this work, you need
>>> + to have more than 4G memory. On PPC, 256M is reserved, 1/32 memory
>>> + on PPC64, but it will not exceed 1T/32.
>>>
>> That aside, I don't see how this will be useful in practice, if it only
>> works for memory sizes over 4G? Or are we saying that people with less
>> than 4G don't need crash kernels? If we're not saying that, those users,
>> or those users' distros, still need to do some logic to work out if they
>> have < 4GB of memory and if so pick a crash kernel size. So why can't
>> they pick the size in the > 4GB case also?
>>
>
> True, I wanted to test the patch and when tested on a ppc64 machine which
> has RAM less than 4GB, I have to modify arch_default_crash_size routine to
> return 256MB (I didn't have a PPC64 machine with more than 4GB RAM handy).
> So its better to consider machines with less than 4GB RAM also.
>
OK, how about 2G on ppc? Is it safe to reserve 256M when I have 2G?
> PPC64 crashkernel base is always 32MB. So at least ppc64 code should have
> its own arch_default_crash_base to return 32MB to avoid the kernel warning
> message "Crash kernel location must be 0x2000000"
>
Hmm, good point, how about KDUMP_KERNELBASE? It looks fine for both ppc
and ppc64.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-21 6:54 [Patch 0/8] V4 Implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:54 ` [Patch 1/8] kexec: allow to shrink reserved memory Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22 0:17 ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-24 1:36 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22 1:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-24 2:02 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:54 ` [Patch 2/8] x86: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:54 ` [Patch 3/8] x86: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:54 ` [Patch 4/8] ia64: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:55 ` [Patch 5/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-22 11:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-24 2:05 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-24 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-24 8:21 ` Bernhard Walle
2009-08-24 10:23 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-24 1:59 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:55 ` [Patch 6/8] powerpc: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-24 13:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-24 14:45 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-25 6:37 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
2009-08-25 10:24 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-25 6:23 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-25 10:28 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-26 6:59 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:55 ` [Patch 7/8] powerpc: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21 6:55 ` [Patch 8/8] doc: update the kdump document Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22 0:06 ` [Patch 0/8] V4 Implement crashkernel=auto Andrew Morton
2009-08-24 1:34 ` Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A938698.40302@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=bernhard.walle@gmx.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox