From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: set QUEUE_ORDERED_DRAIN by default
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:28:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A952A5D.5040606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908262136.46570.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
On 08/26/2009 03:06 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:46:08 pm Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:41:37PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:26:16 am Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>
>>>> Currently virtio-blk doesn't set any QUEUE_ORDERED_ flag by default, which
>>>> means it does not allow filesystems to use barriers. But the typical use
>>>> case for virtio-blk is to use a backed that uses synchronous I/O
>>>>
>>> Really? Does qemu open with O_SYNC?
>>>
>>> I'm definitely no block expert, but this seems strange...
>>> Rusty.
>>>
>> Qemu can open it various ways, but the only one that is fully safe
>> is O_SYNC (cache=writethrough).
>>
> (Rusty goes away and reads the qemu man page).
>
> By default, if no explicit caching is specified for a qcow2 disk image,
> cache=writeback will be used.
>
It's now switched to writethrough. In any case, cache=writeback means
"lie to the guest, we don't care about integrity".
> Are you claiming qcow2 is unusual? I can believe snapshot is less common,
> though I use it all the time.
>
> You'd normally have to add a feature for something like this. I don't
> think this is different.
>
Why do we need to add a feature for this?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 20:56 [PATCH] virtio-blk: set QUEUE_ORDERED_DRAIN by default Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-21 7:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-08-25 14:11 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-25 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-26 12:06 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-26 12:28 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-08-27 10:43 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-27 11:04 ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-28 1:15 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-28 6:33 ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-27 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-17 17:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-22 6:27 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A952A5D.5040606@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox