From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: system gets stuck in a lock during boot
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:42:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9549E5.5020002@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090826073351.GE23435@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> * Justin Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> O.K. I feel better, deleted
>>>> my system, and threw in a minimal built system
>>>> with only the bare essentials to boot.
>>>> (just to make sure things are correct).
>>>>
>>>> unfortunately after building rc6 I'm still hitting
>>>> this. really am not sure why this is happening.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Could you please double-check the bisection result by doing this:
>>>
>>> git revert af6af30c0f
>>>
>>> on the latest kernel and seeing whether that fixes the lockup?
>>>
>>> Bisections are very efficient and hence very sensitive as well to
>>> minimal errors. Just one small mistake near the end of a bisection
>>> can blame the wrong commit.
>>>
>>> So the best way to double-check such 100%-triggerable crashes is to
>>> do the revert. I tried the revert and it can be done fine here.
>>>
>>> [ _If_ that does not fix the bug then to save time you can
>>> 'backtrack' the bisection, instead of re-doing it completely.
>>> I.e. you have your bisection log, re-check the final steps going
>>> backwards. Once you find a discrepancy (i.e. a 'bad' point that
>>> is 'good' or the other way around), redo the bisection log
>>> commands up to that point and continue it up to the end. ]
>>>
>>> Ingo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> shoot, I did not see your post here. when looking at my bisect
>> log, I guess after a git bisect reset it clears?
>>
>> Anyways after git bisect had finished I looked manually at the
>> commits that it had generated the one which I had sent in a post
>> previously, and this one:
>>
>> 9424edc2da097c8589fcc24a72552d33e54be161
>>
>
> (this commit has no effect on your kernel image, at all.)
>
>
yep. but it was worth a try.
>> at the time looking at the commit, I see this to be more of the
>> cause because of it being related to elf as so forth, but as soon
>> as I reverted this on rc6 made no difference.(the previous commit
>> fixes this for me, on a regular tar.ball as well as in git.
>>
>> I think at this point since this system is a fresh from scratch
>> build, I think something might be wrong that I'm doing (all the
>> CFLAGS, and such are in a previous post).
>>
>> At the moment I don't have a problem applying a patch to the
>> kernel for this. especially since I'm the only one that seems to
>> be hitting this, then if more and more reports of this happen then
>> we can go from there.
>>
>
> What would be nice is to verify your bisection end result, i.e. do
> what i suggested:
>
>
yeah I've done this on both kernels three to be exact, and all boot
after reverting
Fix perf-tracepoint OOPS.
As for my system, I'm still convinced that I might be doing something
wrong over here.
>>> Could you please double-check the bisection result by doing this:
>>>
>>> git revert af6af30c0f
>>>
>>> on the latest kernel and seeing whether that fixes the lockup?
>>>
>
> if this doesnt fix it on latest -git then this commit is not the
> cause of the lockup.
>
> Ingo
>
>
This commit(Fix perf-tracepoint OOPS.)does fix my stuckage, but I'm
left, as well as others asking
the question of why.
In any case I still think I'm setting something wrong with either gcc,
or something
that might be causing this from userland.
Justin P. Mattock
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-13 15:42 system gets stuck in a lock during boot Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-18 10:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-08-18 16:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-08-18 16:24 ` Justin Mattock
2009-08-18 19:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-08-18 20:06 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-18 23:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-08-18 23:55 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-19 0:23 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-19 0:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-08-19 1:18 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-19 1:10 ` Li Zefan
2009-08-20 5:51 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-22 7:48 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-24 2:41 ` Li Zefan
2009-08-24 3:07 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-24 5:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 6:13 ` Li Zefan
2009-08-24 6:49 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-24 6:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 7:54 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-24 8:40 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-24 19:19 ` Justin Mattock
2009-08-25 5:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 6:04 ` Li Zefan
2009-08-25 6:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-26 0:22 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-26 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-26 14:42 ` Justin P. Mattock [this message]
2009-09-07 21:49 ` Justin Mattock
2009-10-02 21:12 ` Jason Baron
2009-10-04 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-05 0:10 ` Justin Mattock
2009-10-06 1:00 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-06 1:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-06 2:01 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-06 14:31 ` Jason Baron
2009-10-06 15:12 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-06 1:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-06 20:32 ` Jason Baron
2009-10-06 22:30 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-07 2:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-07 2:42 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-07 13:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-07 14:53 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-07 15:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-07 15:52 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-07 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-07 17:47 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-07 18:45 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-07 18:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-07 19:08 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-12 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-12 18:16 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-07 14:30 ` Jason Baron
2009-10-07 14:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-10-07 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-07 15:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-10-07 15:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-08-24 19:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-08-24 23:34 ` Justin Mattock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9549E5.5020002@gmail.com \
--to=justinmattock@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).