From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] sched: fully ignore RT tasks for CFS load-balancing
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:52:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A958480.3070207@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251297875.18584.5.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Since -rt runs IRQs and SoftIRQs as RT tasks and load-balancing is done
> from softirq context, there is always at least one RT task (and very
> likely multiple) running when we balance.
>
> The current (and totally broken) interaction between RT tasks and CFS
> load-balancing makes it so that we'll try to evacuate a significant
> amount of tasks due to RT tasks being runnable.
>
> Solve this in another broken way by not accounting RT tasks at all.
>
> This will likely break another class of cases, but until we can properly
> fix this, we might as well do this.
Peter,
Do we know why this became a problem lately? I don't recall seeing load
balancing issues like this way back around 2.6.21 or 22 when CFS was
released. Is the cpu_load stuff fairly recent?
--
Darren
>
> Chucked-on-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 4 ----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index adcbc68..385d31f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -926,8 +926,6 @@ static void enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p, int wakeup)
>
> if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
> enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
> -
> - inc_cpu_load(rq, p->se.load.weight);
> }
>
> static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> sleep)
> @@ -942,8 +940,6 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p, int sleep)
> dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
>
> dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
> -
> - dec_cpu_load(rq, p->se.load.weight);
> }
>
> /*
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-26 14:44 [RFC][PATCH -rt] sched: fully ignore RT tasks for CFS load-balancing Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-26 18:52 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2009-08-26 19:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A958480.3070207@us.ibm.com \
--to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox