public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] sched: fully ignore RT tasks for CFS load-balancing
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:52:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A958480.3070207@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251297875.18584.5.camel@twins>

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Since -rt runs IRQs and SoftIRQs as RT tasks and load-balancing is done
> from softirq context, there is always at least one RT task (and very
> likely multiple) running when we balance.
> 
> The current (and totally broken) interaction between RT tasks and CFS
> load-balancing makes it so that we'll try to evacuate a significant
> amount of tasks due to RT tasks being runnable.
> 
> Solve this in another broken way by not accounting RT tasks at all.
> 
> This will likely break another class of cases, but until we can properly
> fix this, we might as well do this.

Peter,

Do we know why this became a problem lately?  I don't recall seeing load 
balancing issues like this way back around 2.6.21 or 22 when CFS was 
released.  Is the cpu_load stuff fairly recent?

--
Darren

> 
> Chucked-on-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_rt.c |    4 ----
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index adcbc68..385d31f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -926,8 +926,6 @@ static void enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p, int wakeup)
> 
>  	if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
>  		enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
> -
> -	inc_cpu_load(rq, p->se.load.weight);
>  }
> 
>  static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> sleep)
> @@ -942,8 +940,6 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p, int sleep)
>  	dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
> 
>  	dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
> -
> -	dec_cpu_load(rq, p->se.load.weight);
>  }
> 
>  /*
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


-- 
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-26 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-26 14:44 [RFC][PATCH -rt] sched: fully ignore RT tasks for CFS load-balancing Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-26 18:52 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2009-08-26 19:04   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A958480.3070207@us.ibm.com \
    --to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox