From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Anton Vorontsov'" <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"'linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Neil Horman'" <nhorman@redhat.com>,
"'Eric W. Biederman'" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"'kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com'"
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"'Andi Kleen'" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"'Michael Ellerman'" <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
"'M. Mohan Kumar'" <mohan@in.ibm.com>,
"'akpm@linux-foundation.org'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"'bernhard.walle@gmx.de'" <bernhard.walle@gmx.de>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:04:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A97ABA9.8030604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A6AD88C3F2289247BE726C37303E1EB8B949E7A3@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Yu, Fenghua wrote:
>>>> + unsigned long long ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (total_size >= GBYTES(4) && total_size < GBYTES(12))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(256);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(12) && total_size < GBYTES(128))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(512);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(128) && total_size < GBYTES(256))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(768);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(256) && total_size < GBYTES(378))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(1024);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(318) && total_size < GBYTES(512))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(1536);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(512) && total_size < GBYTES(768))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(2048);
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(3072);
>>>> + if (!ia64_platform_is("sn2") && !ia64_platform_is("uv"))
>>>> + if (ret > GBYTES(4))
>>>> + ret = ret / GBYTES(4) * MBYTES(256);
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This code doesn't make sense to me. What you really want is following
>>>
>> code, right?
>>
>>> + if (total_size > GBYTES(4))
>>> + ret = total_size / GBYTES(4) * MBYTEST(256)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Nope. Check check_crashkernel_memory().
>>
>
> This statement will be ALWAYS false:
> + if (ret > GBYTES(4))
> since ret's max value is 3GB after the above total_size checks.
>
> So the code doesn't make sense. Did I miss something?
>
Oops, in fact it was supposed to be:
if (ret + base > GBYTES(4))
//blah blah
Hmm, but is it possible for ia64 to choose a base address above 1G? If
no, that code can be removed.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-27 3:15 [Patch 0/8] V5 Implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:15 ` [Patch 1/8] x86: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:15 ` [Patch 2/8] x86: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 3/8] ia64: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 4/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 4:19 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-27 10:26 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 18:13 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-28 10:04 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
2009-08-28 20:08 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 5/8] powerpc: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 6/8] powerpc: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 18:22 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 7/8] doc: update the kdump document Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:17 ` [Patch 8/8] kexec: allow to shrink reserved memory Amerigo Wang
2009-08-31 0:54 ` [Patch 0/8] V5 Implement crashkernel=auto Michael Ellerman
2009-08-31 3:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-31 3:25 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-31 3:27 ` Amerigo Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-04 10:08 [Patch 0/8] V6 " Amerigo Wang
2009-09-04 10:09 ` [Patch 4/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-12 8:15 [Patch 0/8] V3 Implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-12 8:15 ` [Patch 4/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A97ABA9.8030604@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=bernhard.walle@gmx.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox