From: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
bug-coreutils@gnu.org, bug-gnulib@gnu.org,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:04:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A97D5E8.8010906@byu.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82ocq0p0ba.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Florian Weimer on 8/28/2009 6:52 AM:
> * Eric Blake:
>
>> Your version fails to clear the cloexec bit of the final fd if the
>> original caller didn't request O_CLOEXEC.
>
> Okay, but you can fix that in a race-free manner (but I thought that
> this was implied by open_safer).
The current semantics of gnulib's open_safer is that the result is
guaranteed to be 3 or larger. It would require an audit of all gnulib
clients of the open_safer method to see whether it also makes sense to
change the semantics of open_safer to also guarantee that fds start life
with the cloexec bit set. But maybe that is a change worth making in
gnulib, with applications intending to give an fd to a child process being
required to explicitly clear the cloexec bit.
>> Also, your suggestion has a definite race in that you are calling
>> open() multiple times rather than cloning an existing fd after the
>> first open(), such that another process could alter which file is
>> visited between your first and last open().
>
> Sure, but this is an unobservable differen.ce
It is absolutely observable - if the user passed O_CREAT|O_EXCL as part of
their flags, then the second open() will inappropriately fail.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake ebb9@byu.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkqX1egACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDKWACeMM4spqCsmgVVwME9+C/1tdpU
g7wAnR9FetGPGr7acXLfLIVvzYZ7tpz3
=VjUY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-24 12:22 [RFC] new open flag O_NOSTD Eric Blake
2009-08-25 12:16 ` [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD Eric Blake
2009-08-25 21:53 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-08-27 13:54 ` Eric Blake
2009-08-27 14:22 ` Ulrich Drepper
2009-08-28 12:28 ` Eric Blake
2009-08-27 14:35 ` Florian Weimer
2009-08-28 12:45 ` Eric Blake
2009-08-28 12:52 ` Florian Weimer
2009-08-28 12:58 ` Eric Blake
2009-08-28 13:04 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2009-08-27 22:55 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-08-27 23:11 ` Ulrich Drepper
2009-08-30 11:12 ` [RFC] new open flag O_NOSTD James Youngman
2009-08-30 11:18 ` Jim Meyering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A97D5E8.8010906@byu.net \
--to=ebb9@byu.net \
--cc=bug-coreutils@gnu.org \
--cc=bug-gnulib@gnu.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@bfk.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox