From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mm-cc@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] compcache: documentation
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:30:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A988BB4.1030005@vflare.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090828195303.GA4889@balbir.in.ibm.com>
On 08/29/2009 01:23 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Nitin Gupta<ngupta@vflare.org> [2009-08-25 23:41:06]:
>
>> On 08/25/2009 10:33 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> +It consists of three modules:
>>>> + - xvmalloc.ko: memory allocator
>>>
>>> I've seen your case for a custom allocator, but why can't we
>>>
>>> 1) Refactor slob and use it
>>
>> SLOB is fundamentally a different allocator. It looked at it in detail
>> but could not image how can I make it suitable for the project. SLOB
>> really does not fit it.
>>
>>> 2) Do we care about the optimizations in SLUB w.r.t. scalability in
>>> your module? If so.. will xvmalloc meet those requirements?
>>>
>>
>> Scalability is desired which xvmalloc lacks in its current state. My
>> plan is to have a wrapper around xvmalloc that creates per-cpu pools
>> and leave xvmalloc core simple. Along with this, detailed profiling
>> needs to be done to see where the bottlenecks are in the core itself.
>>
>
> I've not yet tested the patches, but adding another allocator does
> worry me a bit. Do you intend to allow other users to consume the
> allocator routines?
>
No. This allocator is not compiled as separate module, does not export any
symbol and is compiled with ramzswap. So, no one else can use it.
Thanks,
Nitin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-29 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-24 4:38 [PATCH 4/4] compcache: documentation Nitin Gupta
2009-08-25 17:03 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25 18:11 ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-28 19:53 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-29 2:00 ` Nitin Gupta [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A988BB4.1030005@vflare.org \
--to=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm-cc@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox